Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:54:26.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Our Issue Positions are Strong, and Our Opponents’ Valence is Weak”: An Analysis of Parties' Campaign Strategies in Ten Western European Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2022

Camilla Bjarnøe
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
James Adams*
Affiliation:
UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Amber Boydstun
Affiliation:
UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jfadams@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

Political parties face strategic decisions about whether to campaign on issue-based appeals, pertaining to debates over such issues as economic, immigration, and environmental policies, versus valence-based appeals, emphasizing leadership attributes, such as character (integrity, honesty, and so on), along with performance, that is, the ability to deliver positive outcomes. To better understand these choices, we analyze parties' national election campaign strategies across ten Western European democracies. We argue for, and empirically substantiate, an: our issues versus their valence effect, that is, that parties' self-presentations will be more issue-based than their presentations of opponents; an extremist party issue focus effect, that is, that parties with more extreme ideologies most strongly emphasize issues over valence in their self-presentations; and a prime ministerial valence focus effect, that is, that prime ministerial parties more strongly self-present on valence. These findings have implications for election outcomes and mass–elite linkages.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, R et al. (2013) When does valence matter? On heightened valence effects for governing parties during election campaigns. Party Politics 19(1), 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acree, BD et al. (2020) Etch-a-Sketching: evaluating the post-primary rhetorical moderation hypothesis. American Politics Research 48(1), 99131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J, Bernardi, L, and Wlezien, C (2020) Social welfare policy outputs and governing parties’ left–right images: do voters respond? Journal of Politics 82(3), 11611165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J, Ezrow, L, and Somer-Topcu, Z (2011) Is anybody listening? Evidence that voters do not respond to European parties’ policy programmes. American Journal of Political Science 55(2), 370382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J, Scheiner, E, and Kawasumi, J (2016) Running on character? Running on policy? An analysis of Japanese candidates’ campaign platforms. Electoral Studies 44(12), 275284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J et al. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50(3), 513529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J et al. (2017) Do moderate voters weigh candidates’ ideologies? Voters’ decision rules in the 2010 congressional elections. Political Behavior 39(1), 205227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, M and Gross, M (2016) Where Is My Party? Introducing New Datasets on Ideological Cohesion and Ambiguity of Party Positions in Media Coverage. Arbeitspapiere—Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung: 2016 167.Google Scholar
Baumann, M, Debus, M, and Gross, M (forthcoming) Strategic issue emphasis in parties’ election campaign statements. Party Politics.Google Scholar
Bernardi L and Adams J (2019) Does Government Support Respond to Governments' Social Welfare Rhetoric or their Spending? An Analysis of Government Support in Britain, Spain and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4). 14071429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishin, B, Stevens, D, and Wilson, C (2006) Character counts? Honesty and fairness in election 2000. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(2), 235248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydstun, AE, Ledgerwood, A, and Sparks, J (2017) A negativity bias in reframing shapes political preferences even in partisan contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science 10(1), 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjarnøe C, Adams J, and Boydstun A (2022) Replication data for: “Our Issue Positions are Strong, and Our Opponents' Valence is Weak”: An Analysis of Parties' Campaign Strategies in Ten Western European Democracies, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FWU1G9. Harvard Dataverse, V1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M (2009) Valence and electoral outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998. Electoral Studies 28(1), 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M (2013) Understanding parties’ policy shifts in Western Europe: the role of valence, 1976–2003. British Journal of Political Science 44(2), 261286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse Philip, E and Pierce, R (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curini, L and Martelli, P (2015) A case of valence competition in elections: parties’ emphasis on corruption in electoral manifestos. Party Politics 21(5), 686698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R (2017) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Evanston, IL:Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Debus, M, Somer-Topcu, Z, and Tavits, M (2016) Comparative Campaign Dynamics Dataset. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
De Sio, L and Lachat, R (2020) Making sense of party strategy innovation: challenge to ideology and conflict-mobilisation as dimensions of party competition. West European Politics 43(3), 688719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, CH et al. (2006) The news coverage of the 2004 European parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics 7(4), 477504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, H and Manow, P (2019) Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version. Available at Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov) / Useful data / Tools for journalists / Home - edjnet (europeandatajournalism.eu)Google Scholar
Downs, A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dunaway, J and Lawrence, RG (2015) What predicts the game frame? Media ownership, electoral context, and campaign news. Political Communication 32(1), 4360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2011) Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign communication: a wild goose chase? Javnost—The Public 18(1), 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrow, L, Homola, J, and Tavits, M (2014) When extremism pays: policy positions, voter certainty, and party support in postcommunist Europe. The Journal of Politics 76(2), 535547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, DM and Schmitt-Beck, R (2003) Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Vazquez, P and Somer-Topcu, Z (forthcoming) The informational role of party leader changes on voter perceptions of party positions. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Gans, HJ (2004) Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanson, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gidron, N, Adams, J, and Horne, W (2020) American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DP, Palmquist, B, and Schickler, E (2004) Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J and Hobolt, S (2008) Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies 27(3), 460476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, DC and Mancini, P (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, KJ (2015) The impact of radical right-wing parties on the positions of mainstream parties regarding multiculturalism. West European Politics 38(3), 557576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S, Sood, G, and Lelkes, Y (2012) Affect, not ideology. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3), 405431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, J (2008) Issue framing and engagement: rhetorical strategy in public policy debates. Political Behavior 30(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, R and Kölln, A-K (2020) Moderation and competence: how a party's ideological position shapes its valence reputation. American Journal of Political Science 64(3), 649663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J-H and Tavits, M (forthcoming) Valence attacks harm the electoral performance of the Left but not the Right. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Kaplan, N, Park, DK, and Ridout, TN (2006) Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising. American Journal of Political Science 50(3), 724736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, VO (1963) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Klüver, H and Spoon, J-J (2016) Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science 46(3), 633654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G (2014) The All New Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Liu, JH and Latané, B (1998) The catastrophic link between the importance and extremity of political attitudes. Political Behavior 20, 105126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M and Budge, I (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracies: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, N (2017) The Manifesto–Media Link: How Mass Media Mediate Manifesto Messages. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/18863Google Scholar
Meyer, TM and Wagner, M (2013) Mainstream or niche? Vote-seeking incentives and the programmatic strategies of political parties. Comparative Political Studies 46(10), 12461272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, J (1995) Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics 57(4), 10431069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, K et al. (2019) Elites tweet to get feet off the streets: measuring regime social media strategies during protest. Political Science Research and Methods 7(4), 815834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neundorf, A and Adams, J (2018) The micro-foundations of party competition and issue ownership: the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and partisan attachments. British Journal of Political Science 48(2), 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, HD and Whitten, GD (1999) The electoral impacts of unexpected inflation and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science 29(3), 623639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, M (2020) Responsive campaigning: evidence from European parties. Journal of Politics 82(4), 11831195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, JR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 40(39), 825850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, GB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Proksch, S-O and Slapin, JB (2015) The Politics of Parliamentary Debate. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, R (2010) Winning isn't everything: third parties in the American two-party system. In L. Sandy Maisel, Berry JM, and Edwards GC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ridout, TN et al. (2018) The long-term and geographically constrained effects of campaign advertising on political polarization and sorting. American Politics Research 46(1), 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagarzazu, I and Kluver, H (2017) Coalition governments and party competition: political communication strategies of coalition parties. Political Science Research and Methods 5(2), 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G, de Vries, C, and Vis, B (2013) Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics 75(2), 464477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, HA et al. (2013) The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheafer, T and Wolfsfeld, G (2009) Party systems and oppositional voices in the news media: a study of the contest over political waves in the United States and Israel. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14(2), 146165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, J (2007) The consequences of campaign agendas. American Politics Research 35(4), 465488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S (2014) Negativity in Democratic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S and Wlezien, C (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, D (1963) Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review 57(2), 368377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D (1992) Valence politics. In Kavanagh, D (ed.), Electoral Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 141162.Google Scholar
Stone, W (2017) Candidates and Voters: Ideology, Valence, and Representation in U.S. Elections in Press. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, E (1950) The intensity component in attitude and opinion research. In Stouffer, S (ed.), Measurement and Prediction. New York, NY: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sulkin, T, Moriarty, CM, and Hefner, V (2007) Congressional candidates’ issue agendas on- and off-line. The International Journal of Press/Politics 12(2), 6379.Google Scholar
The Guardian (2001) Election 2001: fighting talk keeps faint hopes alive: Tory strategy party plans a few well-aimed blows to rattle Blair. The Guardian, May 9.Google Scholar
The Guardian (2005) Blair warns of “rather nasty rightwing campaign.” The Guardian, April 6.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J (2005) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, T and Dekker, P (2011) Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In Zmerli, S and Hooghe, M (eds), Political Trust: Why Context Matters. New York, NY: ECPR Press, pp. 95116.Google Scholar
Wagner, M and Meyer, TM (2014) Which issues do parties emphasize? Salience strategies and party organization in multiparty systems. West European Politic 37(5), 10191045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A and Vliegenthart, R (2010) Negative campaigning across different communication channels: different ball games? The International Journal of Press/Politics 15(4), 441461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zur, R (2019) Stuck in the middle; ideology, valence, and the failures of centrist parties. British Journal of Political Science. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000231Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Bjarnøe et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Bjarnøe et al. supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Bjarnøe et al. supplementary material(File)
File 28.2 KB