Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T12:28:09.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of supplements on intake, rumen function and nutrient supply and growth in cattle eating alkali-treated oat straw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. C. Spragg ,
R. C. Kellaway  and
Jane Leibholz
J. C. Spragg
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2.570, Australia
R. C. Kellaway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2.570, Australia
Jane Leibholz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2.570, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Expt 1. Six 200 kg Hereford heifers fitted with rumen and abomasal cannulas were fed adlib. on alkali-treated oat straw sprayed with urea and minerals, with no supplement (O), or 700 g rolled barley (B) or cottonseed meal (C)/d, in a 3 x 3 Latin square with two replicates.

2. Intakes of the basal diet were not significantly affected by the supplements. Intakes of digestible organic matter (OM) were 3135, 3325 and 3515 g/d on diets O, Bland C respectively. Abomasal OM flow on diet C was 13 and 12% higher than on diets O and B respectively (P < 0.05) which was associated with a decrease in the proportion of OM intake apparently digested in the rumen ( P < 0.05) and an increase in the proportion of abomasal OM digested in the lower gut ( P < 0.05).

3. Total nitrogen and bacterial N flows at the abomasum were significantly higher (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 respectively) on diet C than on diets O and B. Efficiency of bacterial N synthesis on diet C was 19 and 28% higher than on diets 0 and B respectively ( P < 0.05).

4. Dry matter (DM) pool size in the rumen was greater on diet C than on diets O and B (P < 0.05).

5. Expt 2. Thirty-three 210 kg Friesian heifers were allocated to the same treatments as in Expt I. Intakes of the basal straw diet were not significantly affected by the supplements. Intakes of digestible OM were 3.80, 4.16 and 4.34 kg/d on diets O, B and C respectively.

6. Rumen ammonia and plasma urea levels were significantly higher on diet C than on diets O and B ( P < 0.05).

7. Live-weight gains were 679, 838 and 1051 g/d on diets O, B and C respectively ( P < 0.01) and live-weight gain/MJ metabolizable energy intake was highest on diet C (P < 0.01).

8. It was concluded that the growth response to barley was attributable to the increase in energy supply, and that the additional response to cottonseed meal was attributable to greater protein absorption arising from greater abomasal flows of bacterial and dietary proteins.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , September 1986 , pp. 487 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, pp. 153. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Allison, M. J. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 456–473 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Van't Klooster, A. Th. & Frens, A. M. (1968). Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. P., Robinson, I. M. & Chu, H. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 1831–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, A. L. & Marbach, E. P. (1962). Clinical Chemistry 8, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1970). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R., Walker, D. J., Nader, C. J. & Storer, G. (1975). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 217–291 [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1980). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Ana1ysis. Agricultural Handbook no. 319. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1974). Experimental Surgery on Small Rumirrants, pp. 322. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. W., Williamson, P. J., Nolan, J. V., Kernpton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1983). Journai of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 100, 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, I. D. (1970). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, K., Bailey, F. J. & Annison, E. F. (1971). British Journal of Nutrition 25, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1983). World Animal Review 48, 33–37.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. (1980). In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 28–37 [Farrell, D. J., editor]. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1979). British Journal of Nittrifion 42, 289–302.Google Scholar
Lee, G. J., Hennessy, D. W., Williamson, P. J., Nolan, J. V., Kernpton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1985). Australian Journal of Agricultural Reseurch 36, 729–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Broster, W. H., Napper, D. J. & Smith, T. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 128A.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. & Slyter, L. L. (1974). British Journal of Nutrition 32, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, D. M., Davis, C. L. & Bryant, M. P. (1980). Journal of Dairy Science 63, 1248–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slyter, L. L. & Weaver, J. M. (1977). Applied Environmental Microbiology 33, 363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spragg, J. C., Kellaway, R. C. & Kernpton, T. J. (1982). Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 679.Google Scholar
Spragg, J. C., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1984). Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 750.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Trenkle, A. H. (1980). In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminanis, pp. 505–522 [Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P., editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar