Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:11:15.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of available dietary zinc on the utilization of protein by the chick and Japanese quail*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Atkinson ,
P. Vohra  and
F. H. Kratzer
J. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Avian Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
P. Vohra
Affiliation:
Department of Avian Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
F. H. Kratzer
Affiliation:
Department of Avian Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Chicks and quail (Coturnix japonica) were used in the measurement of net protein utilization and true digestibility of nitrogen of isolated soya-bean protein and a mixture of casein and gelatin in zinc-deficient diets.

2. The net protein utilization values for both protein sources were increased when the diets were supplemented with Zn or with the disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid, as was the true digestibility of nitrogen of the isolated soya-bean protein.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1972 , pp. 461 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

Anonymous(1966). Supplement to Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spechophotmetry. Nonvalk, Conn.: Perkin-Elmer Corp.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. & Carpenter, K. J. (1970). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 21, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. & Kratzer, F. H. (1970). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 29, 59A.Google Scholar
Barré, R. (1956). Annls pharm. fr. 14, 182.Google Scholar
Bender, A. E. & Doell, B. H. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnocki, J., Sibbald, I. R. & Evans, E. V. (1961). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 41, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. N., Norris, L. C. & Kratzer, F. H. (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. M. Jr., Young, R. J. & Gillis, M. B. (1958). Poult.Sci. 37, 1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. R. S. & Harrison, B. N. (1964). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 116, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. R. S. & Harrison, B. N. (1966). J. Nutr. 86, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, J. & Zucker, H. (1968). Arch. Geflügelk. 5, 337.Google Scholar
Hsu, J. M., Anilane, J. K. & Scanlan, D. E. (1966). Science, N.Y. 153, 882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kfoury, G. A., Reinhold, J. G. & Simonian, S. J. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, F. H., Allred, J. B., Davis, P. N., Marshall, B. J. & Vohra, P. (1959). J. Nutr. 68, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, T. S. & Zuazaga, G. (1942). Ind. Engng Chem. anulyt. Edn 14, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Bender, A. E. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. F., Quarterman, J., Williams, R. B., Dalgarno, A. C. & Panić, B. (1967). Biochem. J. 102, 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, M. W. & Scott, H. M. (1958). Poult. Sci. 37, 1227.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. B. & Sarett, H. P. (1958). J. Nutr. 65, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberne, P. M., Laerdal, O. A. & O'Dell, B. L. (1957). Poult. Sci. 36, 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberleas, D. & Prasad, A. (1969). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 22, 1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, B. L., Newberne, P. M. & Savage, J. E. (1958). J. Nutr. 65, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, B. L. & Savage, J. E. (1957). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 16, 394.Google Scholar
Roberson, R. H. & Schaible, P. J. (1958). Poult. Sci 37, 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, J. D. & Fisher, H. (1961). J. Nutr. 75, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, J. D. & Fisher, H. (1962). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 13, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, H. F. & Salmon, W. D. (1955). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 88, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeigler, T. R., Leach, R. M. Jr, Norris, L. C. & Scott, M. L. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar