Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:28:07.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Mitchell L. Jones
Affiliation:
Biomedical Technology and Cell Therapy Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Artificial Cells and Organs Research Centre, McGill University, 3775 University Street, Montreal, QC, CanadaH3A 2B4 Micropharma Limited, 141 Avenue du President Kennedy, UQAM, Biological Sciences Building, 5th Floor, Suite 5569, Montreal, QC, CanadaH2X 3Y7
Christopher J. Martoni
Affiliation:
Micropharma Limited, 141 Avenue du President Kennedy, UQAM, Biological Sciences Building, 5th Floor, Suite 5569, Montreal, QC, CanadaH2X 3Y7
Mathieu Parent
Affiliation:
Micropharma Limited, 141 Avenue du President Kennedy, UQAM, Biological Sciences Building, 5th Floor, Suite 5569, Montreal, QC, CanadaH2X 3Y7
Satya Prakash*
Affiliation:
Biomedical Technology and Cell Therapy Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Artificial Cells and Organs Research Centre, McGill University, 3775 University Street, Montreal, QC, CanadaH3A 2B4
*
*Corresponding author: Dr S. Prakash, fax: +1 514 398 7461, email satya.prakash@mcgill.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several studies have reported limited or no reduction in serum cholesterol in response to probiotic formulations. Recently, probiotics have shown promise in treating metabolic disease due to improved strain selection and delivery technologies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a yoghurt formulation containing microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase (BSH)-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242, taken twice per d over 6 weeks, in hypercholesterolaemic adults. A total of 114 subjects completed this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-arm, multi-centre study. This interventional study included a 2-week washout, 2-week run-in and 6-week treatment period. Subjects were randomised to consume either yoghurts containing microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 or placebo yoghurts. Over the intervention period, subjects consuming yoghurts containing microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 attained significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) of 8·92 % (P = 0·016), total cholesterol (TC) of 4·81 % (P = 0·031) and non-HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) of 6·01 % (P = 0·029) over placebo, and a significant absolute change in apoB-100 of − 0·19 mmol/l (P = 0·049). Serum concentrations of TAG and HDL-C were unchanged over the course of the study. Present results show that consumption of microencapsulated BSH-active L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt is efficacious and safe for lowering LDL-C, TC, apoB-100 and non-HDL-C in hypercholesterolaemic subjects. The efficacy of microencapsulated BSH-active L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurts appears to be superior to traditional probiotic therapy and akin to that of other cholesterol-lowering ingredients.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the USA, Europe, Canada and many other industrialised nations(1, Reference Grundy, Cleeman and Merz2). According to present trends in the USA, one in two healthy 40-year-old males and one in three females will develop CAD in their lifetime(Reference Durrington3). CVD are expected to be the main cause of death globally, due to rapidly increasing rates in developing countries and the rising incidence of obesity and diabetes in the industrialised world(Reference Murray and Lopez4, 5). Epidemiological data reveal a log-linear relationship between increasing LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration and relative risk of CAD(Reference Jacobson6). Clinical trials have confirmed this log-linear relationship, showing an almost identical pattern of risk association(Reference Grundy, Cleeman and Merz2).

Dietary recommendations and exercise are the first line of therapy for individuals with elevated LDL-C; however, using these methods only very modest reductions in LDL-C can be realised even with the highest levels of compliance(Reference Talbert7). Patients who find it too difficult to make lifestyle modifications, or those who simply cannot realise enough LDL-C reduction, are offered statin therapy to reduce their risk profile(Reference Stancu and Sima8Reference Pedersen, Kjekshus and Berg10). Unfortunately, less than half the number of patients who qualify for lipid-modifying treatment are receiving it, and only a third of treated patients are achieving their LDL-C goal due to associated cost and other limitations(Reference Grundy, Cleeman and Merz2). Thus, an effort is underway to functionalise food products and develop nutraceuticals that can help lower LDL-C and the risk of CAD.

Probiotic bacteria are defined by the WHO as ‘live micro-organisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’ and are being examined for their efficacy in lowering total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C in humans. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study, by Schaafsma et al. (Reference Schaafsma, Meuling and van Dokkum11), reported a decrease in TC and LDL-C by 4·4 and 5·4 %, respectively, after consumption of yoghurt enriched with Lactobacillus acidophilus and fructo-oligosaccharides three times daily in thirty normolipidaemic male subjects. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study, by Bertolami et al. (Reference Bertolami, Faludi and Batlouni12), reported a decrease in TC and LDL-C by 5·3 and 6·15 %, respectively, after consumption of a fermented milk product containing Enterococcus faecium in thirty-two subjects with mild to moderate hypercholesterolaemia. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, by Agerbaek et al. (Reference Agerbaek, Gerdes and Richelsen13), reported a decrease in LDL-C by 10 % after consumption of a fermented milk product containing E. faecium and two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus, in fifty-eight non-obese, normocholesterolaemic 44-year-old Danish men. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled parallel study, by Agerholm-Larsen et al. (Reference Agerholm-Larsen, Raben and Haulrik14) reported a significant reduction in LDL-C, but only after adjusting for body weight, after consumption of a yoghurt fermented with E. faecium and two strains of S. thermophilus. While these studies have reported positive findings, several placebo-controlled studies have reported little or no effect after daily consumption of various probiotic supplements and foods containing probiotic bacteria(Reference Andersson, Bosaeus and Ellegard15Reference Lin, Ayres and Winkler19).

Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 was selected for its cholesterol-lowering traits and overall strain safety using a rigorous process. Extensive in vitro characterisation was performed on the strain using a combination of molecular and metabolic techniques to support its safety for use in human subjects(Reference Branton, Jones and Tomaro-Duchesneau20). One phenotypic characteristic of the strain is its intrinsic capacity to deconjugate bile acids due to expression of a bile salt hydrolase (BSH) enzyme. The BSH enzyme hydrolyses the C-24 N-acyl amide bond linking the free bile acid to its amino acid conjugate glycine or taurine. It has been hypothesised that deconjugation of bile acids leads to a reduction of serum cholesterol by increasing cholesterol catabolism during the formation of new bile acids, or by reducing cholesterol absorption from dietary and bile sources in the intestinal lumen(Reference Taranto, Sesma and Holgado21Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and Vande23). More recently, several groups have proposed other mechanisms by which bile may act to modulate cholesterol absorption and metabolism in humans(Reference Davidson24Reference Watanabe, Houten and Mataki27).

Extensive research on probiotic survival in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and in various food products has revealed reduced probiotic bacterial cell viability due to exposure to organic acids, hydrogen ions, oxygen and antibacterial components(Reference Holzapfel, Haberer and Snel28, Reference Huang and Adams29). For this reason, the present study was designed to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering potential of alginate-poly-l-lysine-alginate (APA) microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242, which allows for the delivery of highly viable and metabolically active cells to the proximal small intestine. Microencapsulation provides a physical barrier against Ig and digestive enzymes, buffers against an acidic gastric environment, concentrates the bacteria within the microcapsule and provides a microenvironment that aids in precipitation of the deconjugate(Reference Chang30Reference Jones, Chen and Wei32). In fact, we have shown that APA microencapsulated BSH-active Lactobacillus plantarum and L. reuteri strains maintain cell viability and bile acid deconjugation activity through sequential transit in a simulated GI model(Reference Martoni, Bhathena and Jones33, Reference Martoni, Bhathena and Urbanska34). Furthermore, in BioF1B hamsters, a significant cholesterol-lowering effect was observed by APA microencapsulated Lactobacillus as compared to sham (empty) APA microcapsule-treated control(Reference Bhathena, Martoni and Kulamarva35).

Despite improved pharmacotherapy for hypercholesterolaemia, a discrepancy between target cholesterol levels and those clinically realised remains. Thus, additional treatment modalities such as probiotics should be evaluated for their cholesterol-lowering efficacy and safety profile. Accordingly, the main objective of the present study was to assess the cholesterol-lowering clinical efficacy and safety of microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 supplemented in a yoghurt formulation in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study.

Experimental methods

Subjects

The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the central ethics committee (multi-centric ethics committee) and the local ethics committee in the Czech Republic. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, USA, identifier NCT01185795.

Otherwise healthy hypercholesterolaemic adult men and women were recruited from five centres in Prague, Czech Republic. Inclusion criteria for randomisation were otherwise healthy males and females between the ages of 18 and 74 years (inclusive); LDL-C levels >3·4 mmol/l with < 15 % variation between successive screening visits; TAG levels < 4·0 mmol/l; BMI of 22–32 kg/m2; the ability to understand dietary procedures; judged by the investigators as motivated. Exclusion criteria for randomisation were the use of statin or other cholesterol-lowering prescription drugs within the last 6 months; use of plant sterols, n-3 fatty acids, fish oil, soya protein, soluble oat fibre, psyllium seed husk or other cholesterol-lowering supplements within the last 3 months; history of chronic use of alcohol (>2 drinks/d); use of systemic antibodies, corticosteroids, androgens or phenytoin; myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass or other surgical procedures within the last 6 months; lactose intolerance or allergies to dairy products; history of angina, congestive heart failure, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis or diabetes; GI, renal, pulmonary, hepatic or biliary disease, or cancer (evidence of active lesions, chemotherapy or surgery in the past year); chronic use of probiotics or fibre laxatives (>2 doses/week), or stimulant laxatives; history of eating disorders; exercise greater than walking 15 miles/week, or an equivalent energy expense of 16 736 kJ/week (4000 kcal/week); pregnancy, breast feeding or intent to get pregnant.

Preparation of treatment and placebo yoghurts

Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 (Cardioviva™) was propagated in an FV8 fermenter and concentrated in compliance with standard operating procedures and quality control procedures at Microbial Developments Limited (Malvern, UK). Microbiological analyses and bacterial culture purity were confirmed immediately after each production batch. APA microcapsules containing L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 were prepared in compliance with standard operating procedures and quality-control procedures at Brace GmbH (Karlstein, Germany) to a viability of 5 × 109 colony-forming units/g microcapsule. Placebo and treatment yoghurts were produced and prepared at Milcom (Prague, Czech Republic) with compositions as shown in Table 1. Placebo yoghurts were filled to a weight of 125 g in plastic cups. Treatment yoghurts contained 115 g of yoghurt and 10 g of microcapsules containing BSH-active L. reuteri NCIMB 30242. Placebo and treatment yoghurts were produced five times during the study with the batch numbers 1 to 5. The expiry date of placebo and treatment yoghurts was maintained at 3 weeks after yoghurt production. For details of analyses of cell viability and bile salt hydrolase activity of free and microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 in simulated upper GI tract conditions, see Appendix A (to be found in the online Supplementary material; http://www.journals.Cambridge.org/bjn).

Table 1 Composition of placebo and L. reuteri yoghurts

CFU, colony forming unit.

* Measured after production.

Measured after international shipping at 4°C.

Study design

The study design was double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-arm and multi-centred, lasting a total of 10 weeks. This included a 2-week washout period in which general dietary recommendations (Canada's Food Guide, Health Canada) were followed, a 2-week run-in period in which general dietary recommendations were followed and subjects consumed placebo yoghurts twice daily at breakfast or dinner, and a 6-week treatment period in which general recommendations were followed and subjects consumed either placebo or treatment yoghurts twice daily at breakfast or dinner. Subjects met with the investigational team at five different time points: Visit V0 (Week − 4), V1 (Week − 2), V2 (Week 0, randomisation and treatment baseline), V3 (Week 3, treatment midpoint) and V4 (Week 6, treatment endpoint). Dietary intake, including information on total energy, percentage total fat, percentage total carbohydrates and percentage total protein, for subjects consuming placebo yoghurts and treatment yoghurts, was measured at baseline (Week 0) and endpoint (Week 6) of the treatment period.

Sample analysis

Blood for assessment of lipid profile was collected at each visit. Serum samples were analysed enzymatically for LDL-C (primary efficacy variable), TC, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), TAG and apoB-100. Absolute changes in lipid parameters for each subject at midpoint and endpoint were calculated by subtracting the baseline value (Week 0) from the midpoint (Week 3) or endpoint (Week 6) value, respectively. Relative change in lipid parameters for each subject at midpoint and endpoint was calculated by dividing the absolute change at midpoint (Week 3) or endpoint (Week 6) by baseline values (Week 0) and multiplying by 100 %. Blood for assessment of safety profile was collected at visits V1 (Week − 2) and V4 (Week 6, treatment endpoint). Serum biochemistry was analysed for urea, creatinine, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, glucose, Ca2+, PO _{4}^{3 - } , K+, Na+, Cl, HCO _{3}^{ - } and lipase. Serum analysis was performed on a Dimension RxL biochemistry analyser using appropriate reagent kits (Dade Behring, Siemens, Munich, Germany). Whole blood (haematology) was analysed for Hb, haematocrit, erythrocytes, leucocytes and platelets using a Celltac F haematology analyser (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan).

Faecal samples were collected in the 3 d before visits V1 (Week − 2) and V4 (treatment endpoint). Faecal deconjugated bile acid concentration was analysed on 10–15 μg of lyophilised stool samples by GLC as described by Batta et al. (Reference Batta, Salen and Batta36).

Statistical methods

The number of subjects was calculated by taking into account a critical difference in LDL-C of 0·44 (sd 0·8) mmol/l between the treatment and placebo groups with α = 5 % and a power of 80 %. Given these constraints, fifty-three evaluable subjects per group or 106 in total were required. To take into account possible premature withdrawal, a total of 120 subjects was planned to be included for randomisation.

The primary null hypothesis was that treatment was not more effective than placebo in reducing serum LDL-C concentrations. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Continuous variables are presented as means with standard errors of the mean. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine if variables were parametrically distributed. Differences between groups for baseline characteristics were analysed using a one-way ANOVA for continuous variables or χ2 test for categorical variables. Differences in dietary intake of macronutrients and faecal deconjugated bile acids between and within groups were analysed using mixed-model ANOVA. For lipid variables, multiple-linear regression was used to identify variables systematically contributing to any changes from baseline. To test the differences between groups, ANCOVA were performed to adjust for any systematic contribution to the changes from baseline using covariates identified by multiple-linear regression. Lipid parameters not accepting parametric description were analysed by means of Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data analyses were performed using SPSS software package version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Forward, stepwise and backward selection models were completed using SAS software package version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study parameters

A total of 120 subjects were randomised and 114 completed the study as part of the intention-to-treat population. One subject, randomised to the placebo group, dropped out for personal reasons and five subjects, two in the placebo group and three in the treatment group, were excluded as they did not meet the study criteria. Overall, 109 subjects completed the study as part of the per-protocol population. All subjects were considered hypercholesterolaemic and at borderline, high or very high risk of developing heart disease at baseline according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines(1, Reference Grundy, Cleeman and Merz2).

Baseline characteristics of subjects

The baseline characteristics for the 114 subjects in the intention-to-treat population were evaluated and are presented in Table 2. The two groups produced by randomisation were homogeneous in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Male and female study subjects were equally distributed with 34 :66 % males–females in the placebo group and 38 :62 % males–females in the treatment group. There were no significant differences between groups at baseline in age, body weight, BMI, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure, pulse and temperature. Subjects were selected based on fasting serum LDL-C (>3·4 mmol/l) and TAG ( < 4·0 mmol/l). The mean serum concentrations of LDL-C at baseline were not significantly different between placebo and treatment groups (4·23 (sem 0·06) mmol/l compared with 4·37 (sem 0·08) mmol/l, respectively; P = 0·15). Additionally, there were no significant differences between placebo and treatment groups for TC, HDL-C, TAG, apoB-100, LDL-C:HDL-C and non-HDL-C. Statin and other lipid-lowering formulation intake among subjects was 0 % in the 6 months before the study start date.

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline

(Mean values with their standard errors)

BP, blood pressure; bpm, beats per min; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol.

* One-way ANOVA for continuous variables or χ2 test for categorical variables.

Dietary assessment

A dietary assessment of total energy, percentage total lipids, percentage total carbohydrates and percentage total proteins was performed at baseline (Week 0) and at the treatment endpoint (Week 6). There were no significant differences between placebo and treatment groups at baseline or endpoint, and no difference within groups over the treatment period (Table 3).

Table 3 Dietary total energy and macronutrient intake

(Mean values with their standard errors)

* Mixed-model ANOVA.

Serum lipid profile

The mean relative changes of LDL-C, TC, HDL-C, TAG, apoB-100, LDL-C:HDL-C and non-HDL-C from baseline to Week 3 and Week 6 are summarised in Table 4. The LDL-C-lowering effect observed at the 6-week endpoint of the intervention period was − 0·37 (sem 0·11) mmol/l with a significant mean change over placebo of 8·92 % (P = 0·016). Over the 6-week treatment period, other lipid-lowering effects were observed for TC of − 0·77 (sem 0·13) mmol/l, apoB-100 of − 0·19 (sem 0·03) mmol/l and non-HDL-C of − 0·68 (sem 1·11) mmol/l, and significant mean changes over placebo for TC of 4·81 % (P = 0·031) and non-HDL-C of 6·01 % (P = 0·029). Serum concentrations of TAG and HDL-C were unchanged over the course of the study. Three multivariate regression models were used to show that treatment was the primary predictor of LDL-C reduction: a stepwise selection approach showed that treatment was associated with a − 0·44 mmol/l change in LDL-C (P = 0·0008); a forward selection approach showed that treatment was associated with a − 0·39 mmol/l change in LDL-C (P = 0·0027); and a backward selection approach showed that treatment was associated with a − 0·40 mmol/l change in LDL-C (P = 0·0019). Finally, a side-by-side comparison of individual endpoint LDL-C changes from baseline indicates a clear LDL-C-reducing effect across the spectrum of responses (Fig. 1).

Table 4 Relative changes in lipid parameters from baseline at midpoint (Week 3) and endpoint (Week 6)

(Mean values with their standard errors)

LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol.

* ANCOVA adjusted by baseline values.

Kruskal–Wallis test.

Fig. 1 LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) response showing per subject percentage change from baseline to endpoint of treatment period for groups consuming placebo yoghurt (n 58, ) and Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt (n 56, ) in the intention-to-treat population.

Faecal assessment

Faecal samples collected before treatment (Week − 2) and at endpoint (Week 6) were analysed for faecal deconjugated bile acid concentration. A total of forty samples collected was deemed adequate for analysis; twenty-one in the treatment group and nineteen in the placebo group. The mean faecal deconjugated bile acid concentration was not found to be significantly different between groups, before treatment and at endpoint, or within groups over the treatment period (Table 5).

Table 5 Faecal deconjugated bile acids

(Mean values with their standard errors)

* Mixed-model ANOVA.

Safety parameters

Biochemical markers of safety were measured at baseline and endpoint and analysed for significant changes. Haematologic markers were assessed by complete blood cell count, platelets, haematocrit and Hb; kidney function was determined by urea and creatinine; liver function was determined by alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin; pancreatic function was determined by lipase; endocrine function was determined by glucose, Ca2+ and PO _{4}^{3 - } ; and electrolyte balance was determined by K+, Na+, Cl and HCO _{3}^{ - } . Results show that the placebo and treatment groups were comparable for biomarkers of safety at the study endpoint, and the number of subjects with clinically significant values outside the normal range was determined to be six subjects in the placebo group and one subject in the treatment group. No changes in biochemical markers of safety were considered to be a result of treatment (data not shown).

Discussion

This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multi-centre study demonstrates the cholesterol-lowering effect of a novel microencapsulated BSH-active probiotic over 6 weeks. Subjects consuming yoghurts containing microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 attained significant reductions over placebo in LDL-C of 8·92 %, TC of 4·81 % and non-HDL-C of 6·01 %, and a significant absolute change in apoB-100 of − 0·19 (sem 0·03) mmol/l over the intervention period. Serum concentrations of TAG and HDL-C were unchanged over the course of the study. As well, three multivariate regression models were used to show that treatment was the primary predictor of LDL-C reduction. Finally, a side-by-side comparison of individual LDL-C responses at the study endpoint indicates that despite a proportion of subjects who experienced elevated LDL-C values, an LDL-C-lowering effect was observed over the spectrum of LDL-C responses (Fig. 1).

When examining the cholesterol-lowering trend over the course of the study, it is apparent that the time to maximal therapeutic effect may be longer than other cholesterol-lowering therapies(Reference Stancu and Sima8, Reference Andrews, Ballantyne and Hsia37Reference Gagne, Gaudet and Bruckert41). Although only baseline, 3- and 6-week data were collected, a cholesterol-lowering trend was observed over the course of the study, indicating that maximal therapeutic effect may not have been reached by the study endpoint. Thus, future studies should evaluate the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 at later time points. Also, subjects on statin monotherapy were excluded from the study to accurately determine lipid-lowering efficacy of the microencapsulated probiotic alone; however, evidence exists for improved effectiveness of dietary cholesterol-reducing agents in subjects having high cholesterol absorption and low biosynthesis(Reference Ostlund42). Thus, the potential for greater cholesterol reductions in subjects with reduced cholesterol biosynthesis should be explored.

One possible mechanism of action for cholesterol-lowering with BSH-active probiotics is that increased intra-luminal BSH activity may lead to increased excretion of deconjugated bile acids and subsequent removal of serum cholesterol by the liver replacing bile acids lost from the enterohepatic recirculation (de novo synthesis of bile acids by 7α-hydroylase catabolism of cholesterol)(Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and De Saeyer22, Reference De Smet, De Boever and Verstraete43). The conversion of cholesterol to bile acids in the liver and their subsequent secretion and faecal excretion provides the major route for elimination of excess cholesterol. Previously, we have shown that APA microencapsulated BSH-active L. plantarum and L. reuteri strains maintain cell viability and bile acid deconjugating activity in simulated upper GI conditions(Reference Martoni, Bhathena and Jones33, Reference Martoni, Bhathena and Urbanska34). In the present study, despite significant reductions in serum LDL-C, no significant change in faecal deconjugated bile acid excretion was seen in the samples collected. A recent randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial by Ooi et al. (Reference Ooi, Ahmad and Yuen44) showed a significant reduction in plasma TC and LDL-C as a result of synbiotic capsule feeding containing BSH-active L. acidophilus CHO-220 and inulin. However, no significant differences in the levels of plasma deconjugated primary or plasma deconjugated secondary bile acids were observed over the 12-week treatment period. The authors postulated that the BSH activity of L. acidophilus CHO-220, shown in vitro, either was not exhibited in human subjects or was too minimal to produce an observed effect.

Previous studies(Reference De Smet, De Boever and Verstraete43, Reference Jeun, Kim and Cho45, Reference Kumar, Grover and Batish46) in animals have shown hypocholesterolaemic effects of BSH-active probiotics along with increased bile acid excretion. In a porcine model, the strain B. animalis DN-173010, chosen from thirty-eight strains for its bile acid deconjugation capacity, was shown to increase serum deconjugated bile acids after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment(Reference Lepercq, Relano and Cayuela47). It has been suggested that increasing bile acid deconjugation activity in the small intestine could render the deconjugated primary bile acids more susceptible to 7α-dehydroxylation activity by the resident microflora, potentially leading to increased secondary bile acids. However, an increase in the formation of secondary bile acids was not observed in the portal vein of pigs(Reference Lepercq, Relano and Cayuela47) or in the faeces of healthy human subjects(Reference Marteau, Cuillerier and Meance48) upon B. animalis DN-173010 intervention. Evidence for the expression of 7α-dehydroxylase in lactic acid bacteria has not been reported in the literature, and is a genotype that appears to be limited to Enterobacter and Clostridium species within the gut microflora(Reference Begley, Hill and Gahan49). Furthermore, it has also been reported that active and passive absorption of bile acids complement one another and bring about nearly complete absorption of bile acid, whether conjugated or deconjugated, from the small-intestinal contents of rodents(Reference Schiff, Small and Dietschy50). Therefore, one hypothesis states that deconjugation of bile acids proximal to the terminal ileum does not disrupt the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids but rather alters the bile acid pool in circulation. Future studies should therefore assess the complete bile acid profile in circulation as well as in faeces.

A study by Jeun et al. (Reference Jeun, Kim and Cho45) demonstrated increased gene expression changes, together with increased bile acid excretion, on account of L. plantarum feeding in mice. Several mechanisms were postulated to explain the hypocholesterolaemic effect in vivo, including inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis, induction of cellular LDL-C uptake, decreased dietary cholesterol uptake and elevation of bile acid excretion. Given the result in the present study, other mechanisms of action were considered, including down-regulation of farnesoid × receptor (FXR) and consequent effect of liver × receptor (LXR) down-regulation and deconjugated bile acids on adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette G5/G8 heterodimer cholesterol efflux in hepatocytes and enterocytes (Fig. 2). Such a mechanism of action would result in a significant increase in faecal total neutral sterol excretion; thus, future studies should also evaluate neutral sterol excretion in faeces.

Fig. 2 Bile salt hydrolase (BSH)-active microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242, by reducing the concentration of bile acids (BA) returning to the liver or by changing the BA pool profile, may down-regulate farnesoid × receptor (FXR) leading to increased catabolism of cholesterol and synthesis of BA by 7α-hydoxylase. Down-regulation of FXR may lead to up-regulation of liver × receptor (LXR) which has been shown to enhance reverse cholesterol transport, improve glycaemic control(Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and De Saeyer22) and increase the export of free cholesterol from cells through up-regulation of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transports(Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and De Saeyer22). Particularly, ABCG5 and ABCG8 function as heterodimers (ABCG5/G8) at the apical membrane of enterocytes and hepatocytes and limit the accumulation of cholesterol by transporting it into the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen and bile canaliculi. BA, together with cholesterol, promote an active conformation of ABCG5/G8 and increase the efflux of cholesterol(Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and Vande23). Thus, there may be a net efflux of cholesterol by enterocytes and hepatocytes into the GI lumen and bile canaliculi(Reference De Smet, Van Hoorde and Vande23) resulting in a decrease in serum cholesterol and an increase in cholesterol excretion in faeces. LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; LDL-R, LDL receptor; SHP, small heterodimer partner; CBA, conjugated BA.

Analysis of safety parameters did not show deleterious effects of consuming yoghurts containing microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242. There were more subjects with safety parameters that fell outside the clinically normal range in the placebo group, as compared to the treatment group, at the study endpoint. While there were no significant changes in leucocyte count, a crude measure of inflammation, future studies should substantiate this result by looking at acute-phase reactants such as C-reactive protein which have important cardiovascular implications(Reference Ridker, Glynn and Hennekens51Reference Roberts55).

Future studies should continue to look at improving delivery technologies for BSH-active probiotics. Microencapsulation technologies, including APA microencapsulation, should continue to focus on minimising microcapsule diameter, for improved functionality and palatability, while maximising cell loading, ultimately resulting in minimising the dose size required for clinical efficacy.

In summary, several probiotic clinical studies have shown some cholesterol-lowering efficacy(Reference Schaafsma, Meuling and van Dokkum11Reference Agerholm-Larsen, Raben and Haulrik14), while others have shown negative results(Reference Andersson, Bosaeus and Ellegard15Reference Lin, Ayres and Winkler19), which may have been due to poor strain selection, method of delivery or clinical design. In most cases, BSH activity is not mentioned as a characteristic of the strain administered. Previously, a BSH-active strain was shown to significantly decrease TC and LDL-C in humans, when taken as a synbiotic(Reference Ooi, Ahmad and Yuen44). For the present study, L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 was selected using a rigorous cholesterol-lowering and strain safety screening process, including BSH activity, and was delivered using a gastroprotective microencapsulation technology. The present results support efficacy and safety of the formulation in lowering LDL-C, TC, apoB-100 and non-HDL-C in hypercholesterolaemic adults over 6 weeks. The hypocholesterolaemic effect of microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 in yoghurt compares favourably with other cholesterol-lowering food ingredients(Reference Demonty, Ras and van der Knaap38).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Lahovský, A. Vajikova, N. Barannikova, K. Beber, L. Coupal and S. Grover for their contribution to the study. The authors also thank all volunteers who participated in the study. M. L. J., S. P. and C. J. M. designed the study and prepared the manuscript; J. Lahovský, A. Vajikova and N. Barannikova conducted the research; K. Beber, M. P., L. Coupal and S. Grover performed the statistical analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. This work was supported by Micropharma Limited. M. L. J., C. J. M., M. P. and S. P. are with Micropharma Limited and report a conflict of interest. All other contributors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

1 National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) (2002) Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106, 31433421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Grundy, SM, Cleeman, JI, Merz, CNB, et al. (2004) Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation 110, 227239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Durrington, P (2003) Dyslipidaemia. Lancet 362, 717731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Murray, CJ & Lopez, AD (1997) Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349, 14361442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 World Health Organization (2002) The World Health Report 2002 – Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
6 Jacobson, TA (2000) ‘The lower the better’ in hypercholesterolemia therapy: a reliable clinical guideline? Ann Intern Med 133, 549554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Talbert, RL (2002) New therapeutic options in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Am J Manag Care 8, S301S307.Google ScholarPubMed
8 Stancu, C & Sima, A (2001) Statins: mechanism of action and effects. J Cell Mol Med 5, 378387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Oliver, MF, Defeyter, PJ, Lubsen, J, et al. (1994) Effect of simvastatin on coronary atheroma – the Multicenter Anti-Atheroma Study (Maas). Lancet 344, 633638.Google Scholar
10 Pedersen, TR, Kjekshus, J, Berg, K, et al. (1994) Randomized trial of cholesterol-lowering in 4444 patients with coronary-heart-disease – the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344, 13831389.Google Scholar
11 Schaafsma, G, Meuling, WJ, van Dokkum, W, et al. (1998) Effects of a milk product, fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus and with fructo-oligosaccharides added, on blood lipids in male volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 436440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Bertolami, MC, Faludi, AA & Batlouni, M (1999) Evaluation of the effects of a new fermented milk product (Gaio) on primary hypercholesterolemia. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 97101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Agerbaek, M, Gerdes, LU & Richelsen, B (1995) Hypocholesterolemic effect of a new fermented milk product in healthy middle-aged men. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, 346352.Google Scholar
14 Agerholm-Larsen, L, Raben, A & Haulrik, N (2000) Effect of 8 week intake of probiotic milk products on risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 288297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Andersson, H, Bosaeus, I, Ellegard, L, et al. (1995) Effects of low-fat milk and fermented low-fat milk on cholesterol absorption and excretion in ileostomy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, 274281.Google ScholarPubMed
16 de Roos, NM, Schouten, G & Katan, MB (1999) Yoghurt enriched with Lactobacillus acidophilus does not lower blood lipids in healthy men and women with normal to borderline high serum cholesterol levels. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Greany, KA, Bonorden, MJ, Hamilton-Reeves, JM, et al. (2008) Probiotic capsules do not lower plasma lipids in young women and men. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 232237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Lewis, SJ & Burmeister, S (2005) A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on plasma lipids. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 776780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Lin, SY, Ayres, JW, Winkler, L Jr, et al. (1989) Lactobacillus effects on cholesterol: in vitro and in vivo results. J Dairy Sci 72, 28852899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Branton, WB, Jones, ML, Tomaro-Duchesneau, C, et al. (2011) In vitro characterization and safety of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri cardioviva NCIMB 30242. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 6, 112.Google Scholar
21 Taranto, MP, Sesma, F, Holgado, APD, et al. (1997) Bile salts hydrolase plays a key role on cholesterol removal by Lactobacillus reuteri. Biotechnol Lett 19, 845847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 De Smet, I, Van Hoorde, L, De Saeyer, M, et al. (1994) In vitro study of bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity of BSH isogenic Lactobacillus plantarum 80 strains and estimation of cholesterol lowering through enhanced BSH activity. Microb Ecol Health Dis 7, 315329.Google Scholar
23 De Smet, I, Van Hoorde, L, Vande, WM, et al. (1995) Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 79, 292301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Davidson, MH (2008) Interrupting bile-acid handling and lipid and glucose control: effects of colesevelam on glucose levels. J Clin Lipid 2, S29S33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Johnson, BJ, Lee, JY, Pickert, A, et al. (2010) Bile acids stimulate ATP hydrolysis in the purified cholesterol transporter ABCG5/G8. Biochemistry 49, 34033411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Thomas, C, Pellicciari, R, Pruzanski, M, et al. (2008) Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7, 678693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Watanabe, M, Houten, SM, Mataki, C, et al. (2006) Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature 439, 484489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Holzapfel, WH, Haberer, P, Snel, J, et al. (1998) Overview of gut flora and probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 41, 85101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Huang, Y & Adams, MC (2004) In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 91, 253260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Chang, TMS (2005) Therapeutic applications of polymeric artificial cells. Nature Rev Drug Discov 4, 221235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Gugerli, R, Cantana, E, Heinzen, C, et al. (2002) Quantitative study of the production and properties of alginate/poly-l-lysine microcapsules. J Microencapsul 19, 571590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Jones, ML, Chen, HM, Wei, OY, et al. (2004) Microencapsulated genetically engineered Lactobacillus plantarum 80 (pCBH1) for bile acid deconjugation and its implication in lowering cholesterol. J Biomed Biotechnol 1, 6169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Martoni, C, Bhathena, J, Jones, ML, et al. (2007) Investigation of microencapsulated BSH active Lactobacillus in the simulated human GI tract. J Biomed Biotechnol 2007, 13684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Martoni, C, Bhathena, J, Urbanska, AM, et al. (2008) Microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase producing Lactobacillus reuteri for oral targeted delivery in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81, 225233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Bhathena, J, Martoni, C, Kulamarva, A, et al. (2009) Orally delivered microencapsulated live probiotic formulation lowers serum lipids in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. J Med Food 12, 310319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Batta, AK, Salen, G, Batta, P, et al. (2002) Simultaneous quantitation of fatty acids, sterols and bile acids in human stool by capillary gas-liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 775, 153161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Andrews, TC, Ballantyne, CM, Hsia, JA, et al. (2001) Achieving and maintaining national cholesterol education program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with five statins. Am J Med 111, 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Demonty, I, Ras, RT, van der Knaap, HC, et al. (2009) Continuous dose-response relationship of the LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of phytosterol intake. J Nutr 139, 271284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Patel, J, Sheehan, V & Gurk-Turner, C (2003) Ezetimibe (Zetia): a new type of lipid-lowering agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 16, 354358.Google ScholarPubMed
40 Hou, R & Goldberg, AC (2009) Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: statins, ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and combinations: comparative efficacy and safety. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 38, 7997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Gagne, C, Gaudet, D & Bruckert, E (2002) Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin or simvastatin in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 105, 24692475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Ostlund, RE Jr (2004) Phytosterols and cholesterol metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol 15, 3741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 De Smet, I, De Boever, P & Verstraete, W (1998) Cholesterol lowering in pigs through enhanced bacterial bile salt hydrolase activity. Br J Nutr 79, 185194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Ooi, LG, Ahmad, R, Yuen, KH, et al. (2010) Lactobacillus acidophilus CHO-220 and inulin reduced plasma total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol via alteration of lipid transporters. J Dairy Sci 93, 50485058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 Jeun, J, Kim, S, Cho, SY, et al. (2010) Hypocholesterolemic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 by increased bile acid excretion in C57BL/6 mice. Nutrition 26, 321330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Kumar, R, Grover, S & Batish, VK (2011) Hypocholesterolaemic effect of dietary inclusion of two putative probiotic bile salt hydrolase-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains in Sprague–Dawley rats. Br J Nutr 105, 561573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Lepercq, P, Relano, P, Cayuela, C, et al. (2004) Bifidobacterium animalis strain DN-173 010 hydrolyses bile salts in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Scand J Gastroenterol 39, 12661271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Marteau, P, Cuillerier, E, Meance, S, et al. (2002) Bifidobacterium animalis strain DN-173 010 shortens the colonic transit time in healthy women: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16, 587593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Begley, M, Hill, C & Gahan, CGM (2006) Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 17291738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Schiff, ER, Small, NC & Dietschy, JM (1972) Characterization of the kinetics of the passive and active transport mechanisms for bile acid absorption in the small intestine and colon of the rat. J Clin Invest 51, 13511362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Ridker, PM, Glynn, RJ & Hennekens, CH (1998) C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction. Circulation 97, 20072011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Ridker, PM, Hennekens, CH, Buring, JE, et al. (2000) C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 342, 836843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 Ridker, PM, Rifai, N, Clearfield, M, et al. (2001) Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N Engl J Med 344, 19591965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54 Ridker, PM, Stampfer, MJ & Rifai, N (2001) Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis – a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA 285, 24812485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55 Roberts, WL (2004) CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease – Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice – Laboratory tests available to assess inflammation performance and standardization – A background paper. Circulation 110, E572E576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of placebo and L. reuteri yoghurts

Figure 1

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 2

Table 3 Dietary total energy and macronutrient intake(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Table 4 Relative changes in lipid parameters from baseline at midpoint (Week 3) and endpoint (Week 6)(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) response showing per subject percentage change from baseline to endpoint of treatment period for groups consuming placebo yoghurt (n 58, ) and Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt (n 56, ) in the intention-to-treat population.

Figure 5

Table 5 Faecal deconjugated bile acids(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 6

Fig. 2 Bile salt hydrolase (BSH)-active microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242, by reducing the concentration of bile acids (BA) returning to the liver or by changing the BA pool profile, may down-regulate farnesoid × receptor (FXR) leading to increased catabolism of cholesterol and synthesis of BA by 7α-hydoxylase. Down-regulation of FXR may lead to up-regulation of liver × receptor (LXR) which has been shown to enhance reverse cholesterol transport, improve glycaemic control(22) and increase the export of free cholesterol from cells through up-regulation of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transports(22). Particularly, ABCG5 and ABCG8 function as heterodimers (ABCG5/G8) at the apical membrane of enterocytes and hepatocytes and limit the accumulation of cholesterol by transporting it into the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen and bile canaliculi. BA, together with cholesterol, promote an active conformation of ABCG5/G8 and increase the efflux of cholesterol(23). Thus, there may be a net efflux of cholesterol by enterocytes and hepatocytes into the GI lumen and bile canaliculi(23) resulting in a decrease in serum cholesterol and an increase in cholesterol excretion in faeces. LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; LDL-R, LDL receptor; SHP, small heterodimer partner; CBA, conjugated BA.

Supplementary material: File

Jones Supplementary Appendix

Jones Supplementary Appendix

Download Jones Supplementary Appendix(File)
File 148 KB