Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T14:12:13.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amino acid oxidation by young pigs receiving diets with varying levels of sulphur amino acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Kyu-Il Kim  and
Henry S. Bayley
Kyu-Il Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2WI, Canada
Henry S. Bayley
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2WI, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Piglets were weaned at 3 d of age and were introduced to liquid diets in which 400 g/kg protein was supplied as skim-milk powder and the balance as a mixture of free amino acids. The skim milk contributed 2·3 g methionine and 1·4 g cystine/kg diet; the experimental diets were made by supplementing these levels with free amino acids.

2. The adequacy of the test level of the amino acid in the diet was assessed by measuring the oxidation of [1−14]phenylalanine as an indicator of the partition of the essential amino acids between incorporation into protein and degradation. Radioactivity recovered as carbon dioxide was used as a measure of catabolism.

3. Addition of 0·2, 0·4, 0·7, 1·2 and 1·7 g L-methione/kg to a diet containing 5 g cystine and 3 g choline chloride/kg showed that phenylalanine catabolism was minimal for the diet with 2·7 g methionine/kg indicating that this is the dietary requirement for methionine to serve as a source of methionine residues for protein synthesis.

4. Addition of D-methionine to produce a series of diets with graded levels of methionine showed that the D-isomer was less effective than the L-isomer in reducing phenylalanine catabolism: the addition of 0·8 g D-methionine/kg diet was needed to produce the same effect as 0·4 g L-methionine/kg diet showing that the replacement value of D-methionine for L-methionine was 50% in the young pig.

5. To investigate the influence of cystine on methionine requirement, diets with varying levels of methionine and cystine were prepared. Oxidation of [U-14C]methionine was used as an indication of an excess of methionine, and the results showed that increasing the dietary methionine level above 3·0 g/kg in diets containing 1·4 g cystine/kg provided an excess of methionine for oxidation. This indicated a sulphur amino acid requirement of 4·4 g/kg, one-third of this being supplied as cystine.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 383 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Aguilar, T. S., Benevenga, N. J. & Harper, A. E. (1974). Journal of Nutrition 104, 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D. H. & Boebel, K. P. (1980). Journal of Nutrition 110, 959–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. P. (1953). Physiologial Reviews 33, 145–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, P. J. (1979). Metabolism of D-methionine in the piglet. MSc Thesis, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Esnaola, M. A. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, I. M., Owens, F. N., Brown, R. E. & Garrigus, U. S. (1973). Journal of Animal Science 36, 965–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, G. L. & Benevenga, N. J. (1976). Journal of Nutrition 106, 1721–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, E. R. & Bayley, H. S. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, E. S., Anderson, D. W., Filer, L. J. Jr. & Stegink, L. D. (1980). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 4, 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, E. S. & Stegink, L. D. (1979). Journal of Nutrition 109, 1086–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, D. (1977). Amino acid metabolism in the young pig. MSc Thesis, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
Kang-Lee, Y. A. & Harper, A. E. (1977). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1427–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang-Lee, Y. A. & Harper, A. E. (1978). Journal of Nutrition 108, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R. S. & Baker, D. H. (1975). Poultry Science 54, 1667–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kies, C., Fox, H. & Aprahamion, S. (1975). Journal of Nutrition 105, 809–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. I., McMillan, I. & Bayley, H. S. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunchick, C., Clawson, A. J., Armstrong, W. D. & Linnerud, A. C. (1978). Journal of Animal Science 47, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. D. & Benevenga, N. J. (1978). Journal of Nutrition 108, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1979). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, no. 2, Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Stegink, L. D., Moss, J., Printen, K. J. & Cho, E. S. (1980). Journal of Nutrition 110, 1240–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar