Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T20:59:21.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patients’ Perceptions of Informed Consent for Surgical Procedures in Northern Ireland: A Retrospective Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

Heather Shannon  and
Tricia Scott
Heather Shannon*
Affiliation:
MSc Nursing Student, Royal College of Nursing Institute, UK
Tricia Scott
Affiliation:
MSc Nursing Research Dissertation Supervisor, Royal College of Nursing Institute, UK
*
Correspondence to: Heather Shannon, Clinical Risk Manager, Risk Management Department, Health and Care Centre, 39 Regent Street, Newtownards, Co Down, Northern Ireland, UK. E-mail: heather.shannon@setrust.hscni.net
Get access

Abstract

Consent for surgical procedures is in the public domain following the Bristol and Liverpool enquiries [Department of Health, 2001a; House of Commons, 2001]. A legal and ethical principle exists whereby consent must be obtained before commencing a physical examination, starting treatment or physical investigation, or providing care. Non-compliance with this requirement is treated most seriously and professionals who choose to do otherwise risk investigation by the relevant regulatory body and/or legal proceedings. Guidance for health and social care professionals, including students, relates specifically to physical interventions on living individuals. The following research investigated patient satisfaction with the process of declaring informed consent prior to surgery. In 2006, a retrospective descriptive survey of a random sample of 200 patients two months following surgery was conducted in a local hospital in Northern Ireland. Data analysis generated frequencies and percentages using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Results suggested that the majority of respondents expressed satisfaction with the amount of information they had received, and most preferred to receive information from a mixture of doctors and nurses. The majority wanted the same amount of information, though there was a significant number who wanted more information. The importance of ensuring the patient receives adequate information prior to surgery/procedure is imperative if the health service is to offer transparency in surgical service provision in line with government guidelines.

Keywords

informed consentsurgerydescriptive surveysurgeonnurseanaesthetistNorthern Ireland
Type
Original Article
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 55 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, P, Sapsford, R. Research Methods for Nurses and the Caring Professions (2nd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bhutta, ZA. Beyond informed consent. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004; 82 (10): 771–778.Google ScholarPubMed
Chan, T, Eckert, K, Venesoen, P, Leslie, K, Chin-Yee, I. Informed consenting to blood: what do patients remember? Transfusion Medicine 2005; 15 (6): 461–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Children’s Heart Federation. Children’s Heart Services: A Guide to Care Standards; Guidelines for Paediatric Cardiac Services in the UK . Children’s Heart Federation, 2001.Google Scholar
Dalla-Vargia, P, Lascarates, J, Skiadas, P, Geranis-Papadatos, T. Is informed consent in medicine a concept only of modern times? Journal of Medical Ethics 2001; 27 (1): 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London: The Stationery Office (Cmnd 4818–I), 2000.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Learning from Bristol: the Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. London: The Stationery Office (Cmnd 5207) (Chairperson: I. Kennedy), 2001a.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Good Practice in Informed Consent Implementation Guide: Informed Consent to Examination or Treatment. London: DoH, 2001b.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Families and Post Mortems: a Code of Practice. London: DoH, 2003a.Google Scholar
Department of Health. The Import and Export of Human Body Parts and Tissue for Nontherapeutic Uses – a Code of Practice. London: DoH, 2003b.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Human Tissue Act. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. Belfast: DHSSPS, 2002.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination, Treatment or Care. Belfast: DHSSPS, 2003a.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. Good Practice in Consent. Consent for Examination, Treatment or Care: a Handbook for the HPSS. Belfast: DHSSPS, 2003b.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. Good Practice in Consent. Belfast: DHSSPS (HSS (MD) 7/2003), 2003c.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. The Quality Standards for Health and Social Care: Supporting Good Governance and Best Practice in the HPSS. Belfast: DHSSPS, 2006.Google Scholar
Fink, A. How to Conduct Surveys: a Step-by-step Guide (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Seeking Patients’ Consent: the Ethical Considerations. London: GMC, 1998.Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2006.Google Scholar
House of Commons. The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry Report. London: The Stationery Office (Chairman: M. Redfern), 2001.Google Scholar
Howlader, MH, Dhanji, A-R, Uppal, R, Magee, P, Wood, AJ, Anyanwu, AC. Patients’ views of the informed consent process for adult cardiac surgery: questionnaire survey. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 2004; 38 (6): 363–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laing, IA, McIntosh, N. Practicalities of informed consent. Lancet 2004; 364 (9435): 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColl, E, Jacoby, A, Thomas, L, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technology Assessment 2001; 5 (31): 1–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nursing and Midwifery Council. The NMC Code of Professional Conduct: Standards for Conduct, Performance and Ethics. London: NMC, 2004.Google Scholar
Nursing and Midwifery Council. Guidelines for Records and Record Keeping. London: NMC, 2005.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29 (1): 4–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheim, AN. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Parahoo, AK. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues (2nd edn). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd, 2006.Google Scholar
Pennels, C. Obtaining informed consent: the use of a consent form. Professional Nurse 2001; 16 (10): 1433–1434.Google ScholarPubMed
Polit, DF, Beck, CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods (7th edn). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.Google Scholar
Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority. Review of the Lessons Arising from the Death of Mrs Janine Murtagh: Quality Improvement Review. Belfast: RQIA, 2005.Google Scholar
Strommel, M, Wills, CE. Clinical Research: Concepts and Principles for Advanced Practice Nurses. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.Google Scholar
Waisel, DB, Troug, RD. Informed consent. Anesthesiology 1997; 87 (4): 968–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed