Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:46:16.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetism and chronometers: the research of the Reverend George Fisher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

G. W. Roberts
G. W. Roberts
Affiliation:
Selwyn College, Cambridge, CB3 9DQ, UK. Email: gwr23@cam.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although largely remembered as an astronomer, the Reverend George Fisher (1794–1873) played a significant part in studying the performance and possible improvement of marine chronometers in the mid-nineteenth century. Appointed astronomer to the Royal Navy's Arctic expedition of 1818, while on the voyage Fisher carried out research into the effects of magnetism on the accurate running of chronometers on board ship. By this time, chronometers were standard equipment on many ships and their reliability was a matter of importance to all mariners. Fisher's published findings from this research led to considerable contemporary debate, and also influenced the work of others in the field. Moreover, as papers held at the National Maritime Museum show, he carried on his chronometer research in later life, making further contributions to the subject that have remained somewhat neglected.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 57 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In particular A. McConnell, ‘Fisher, George (1794–1873)’, ODNB, Oxford, 2004 (online edition: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/9495, accessed 23 June 2007).

2 Anon., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1874), 36, 140–4.Google Scholar

3 Brooks, R. C., ‘Magnetic influence on chronometers, 1798–1834’, Annals of Science (1987), 44, 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Fisher, G., ‘On the errors in longitude as determined by chronometers at sea, arising from the action of the iron in the ships upon the chronometers’, Philosophical Transactions (1820), 110, 196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 W. E. Parry, Appendix to Captain Parry's Journal of a Second Voyage for the Discovery of a North-West Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific, London, 1825.

6 C. R. Markham, The Arctic Navy List, 1773–1873, London, 1875, 16.

7 For more detail on the development of the chronometer see May, W. E., ‘How the chronometer went to sea’, Antiquarian Horology (1976), 9, 638–63Google Scholar; R. T. Gould, The Marine Chronometer: Its History and Development, London, 1922, 54–78; W. Andrews (ed.), The Quest for Longitude, Harvard, 1996.

8 Johnson, P., ‘The Board of Longitude 1714–1828’, Journal of the British Astronomical Association (1989), 99, 63–9, 66Google Scholar; D. Howse, Greenwich Time and the Longitude, London, 1997.

9 Johnson, op. cit. (8), 68.

10 J. Cook, A voyage to the Pacific Ocean: undertaken, by the command of His Majesty, for making discoveries in the Northern Hemisphere: to determine the position and extent of the west side of North America … performed under the direction of Captains Cook, Clerke, and Gore, in His Majesty's Ships the Resolution and Discovery, in the years 1776, 1777, 1778, 1779, and 1780, London, 1784.

11 Cook, op. cit. (10), 4.

12 Davies, A. C., ‘The life and death of a scientific instrument: the marine chronometer, 1770–1920’, Annals of Science (1978), 35, 509–25, 524CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Forbes, E. G., ‘The origin and development of the marine chronometer’, Annals of Science (1966), 22, 1–25, 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 T. Mudge the younger, A Narrative of Facts relating to Some Timekeepers Constructed by T. Mudge for the Discovery of the Longitude at Sea, Together with Observations Upon the Conduct Of the Astronomer Royal Inspecting Them, London, 1792.

15 Gough, B. M., ‘British–Russian rivalry and the search for the north-west passage in the early nineteenth century’, Polar Record (1986), 23, 301–17, 308CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 A. Savours, The Search for the North West Passage, London, 1999, 39; F. Fleming, Barrow's Boys, London, 1998.

17 J. Barrow, A Chronological History of Voyages Into the Arctic Regions; Undertaken Chiefly for the Purpose of Discovering a North-East, North-West or Polar Passage Between the Atlantic and Pacific, London, 1818, 364.

18 F. W. Beechey, A Voyage of Discovery Towards the North Pole: Performed in His Majesty's Ships Dorothea and Trent Under the Command of Captain David Buchan R.N., 1818; to which is added, a summary of all the early attempts to reach the Pole, London, 1843, 9–10.

19 Beechey, op. cit. (18), 17–19.

20 John Franklin's journal, January to 2 June 1818, Scott Polar Research Institute (SPRI), MS 248/270, 3.

21 Savours, op. cit. (16), 43.

22 Barrow, op. cit. (17), 367.

23 Beechey, op. cit. (18), 333–9.

24 Fisher, op. cit. (4).

25 Fisher, op. cit. (4), 200.

26 John Franklin, Account of Preparations for the British Naval North Polar Expedition, 1818, SPRI, MS248/270. Moore also sent his chronometer on Franklin's overland polar expedition in 1819.

27 Certificate of Election of Daniel Moore (c.1760–1828), Royal Society, MS EC/1810/06.

28 H. B. Woodward, The History of the Geological Society of London, London, 1907, 6.

29 May, op. cit. (7), 656.

30 Fisher, op. cit. (4), 202.

31 Brooks, op. cit. (3), 248.

32 Board of Longitude minutes, 1 June 1820, Cambridge University Library (CUL), MS RGO 14/7.

33 J. Ross, A Voyage of Discovery, Made Under the Orders of the Admiralty, in His Majesty's Ships Isabella and Alexander, for the Purpose of Exploring Baffin's Bay, and Enquiring Into the Probability of a North-West Passage, London, 1819, 9–11.

34 Ross, op. cit. (33), 198.

35 E. Sabine, ‘Chronometers: Determination of Latitude and Longitude: Account of Performance on Isabelle Voyage’, the National Archives (NA), BJ 3/62.

36 Edward Sabine to ‘My Dear Friend’ (possibly James Rennell), 22 June 1818, SPRI, MS862;BJ.

37 M. Flinders, A Voyage to Terra Australis in the years 1801, 1802 and 1803; Vol. II, London, 1814.

38 A. E. Fanning, Steady as She Goes: A History of the Compass Department of the Admiralty, London, 1986, p. xxii.

39 Sabine, E., ‘On irregularities observed in the direction of the compass needles of HMS Isabella and Alexander, in their late Voyage of Discovery, and caused by the Attraction of the Iron Contained in Ships’, Philosophical Transactions (1819), 109, 112–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scoresby, W. junior, ‘On the anomaly in the variation of the magnetic needle as observed on ship-board’, Philosophical Transactions (1819), 109, 96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Ross, op. cit. (33), p. xiii (appendix).

41 J. Franklin, Notes on Magnetism, 1818, SPRI, MS248/275.

42 See Winter, A., ‘“Compasses All Awry”: the iron ship and the ambiguities of cultural authority in Victorian Britain’, Victorian Studies (1994), 37, 70–98Google Scholar.

43 Varley, S., ‘On the irregularity in the rate of going of time-pieces occasioned by the influence of magnetism’, Philosophical Magazine (1798), 1, 16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Varley, op. cit. (43), 16.

45 Davies, A. C., ‘Horology and navigation: the chronometers on Vancouver's expedition, 1791–95’, Antiquarian Horology (1993–4), 21, 244–55, 254–5Google Scholar.

46 Gould, op. cit. (7), 311.

47 R. Warter's proposal to regulate chronometers by keeping them in the sea, 4 August 1783, CUL, RGO 14/23.

48 Board of Longitude minutes, 5 March 1812, CUL, RGO 14/7.

49 Grimaldi to the Board of Longitude, 2 March 1812, CUL, RGO 14/24.

50 Board of Longitude minutes, 3 June 1813, CUL, RGO 14/7.

51 Barlow, P., ‘On the effects produced in the rates of chronometers by the proximity of masses of iron’, Philosophical Transactions (1821), 111, 361–9, 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Barlow, op. cit. (51), 381.

53 Scoresby, W., ‘Observations on the errors in the sea-rates of chronometers arising from the magnetism of their balances; with suggestions for removing this source of error’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (1823), 9, 353–64, 353–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Scoresby, op. cit. (53), 358–9.

55 Scoresby, op. cit. (53), 361.

56 Bond, W. Cranch, ‘Observations on the comparative rates of marine chronometers’, Memoirs of the American Academy; Arts and Sciences (1833), 1, 84–90Google Scholar.

57 Bond, op. cit. (56), 85.

58 Bond, op. cit. (56), 86.

59 Brooks, op. cit. (3), 256.

60 Brooks, op. cit. (3), 263 – although Brooks does note that it seems likely that Barlow actually wrote the section as early as 1823.

61 Parry, op. cit. (5), 165–88.

62 Fisher, G., ‘Experiments on chronometers; glass balance springs’, Nautical Magazine (1833), II, 737–8.Google Scholar

63 Fanning, op. cit. (38), 107.

64 G. Fisher, Notes on Chronometers, Hartwell Observatory, National Maritime Museum (NMM), Mss. ref, FIS/21; George Fisher, Workings on Chronometers, NMM, Mss. ref. FIS/22.

65 G. Fisher, Rates of Chronometers, NMM, Mss. ref. FIS/21.

66 Lee, J., ‘An account of the observatory at Hartwell House’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1854), 14, 215–17Google Scholar. For more on Lee himself see A. McConnell, ‘Lee, John (1783–1866)’, ODNB, Oxford, 2004 (online edition: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/16297, accessed 23 June 2007).

67 G. Fisher, Chronometer Research, NMM, Mss. ref. FIS/22.

68 Fisher, G., ‘Effects of magnetism on the rates of chronometers’, Nautical Magazine (1837), V, 160–5, 160.Google Scholar

69 Fisher to Airy, 6 April 1836, CUL, RGO 6/585.

70 Fisher to Airy, 11 November 1839, CUL, RGO 6/585.

71 Airy to Fisher, 15 November 1839, CUL, RGO 6/585.

72 Airy, G. B., ‘Magnetism of chronometers’, Nautical Magazine (1840), VIII, 231–7Google Scholar.

73 Airy to Fisher, 12 April 1859, CUL, RGO 6/689. On this particular matter the two men quite strongly disagreed on the results, with Airy eventually telling Fisher that he was completely wrong in his view that there was no merit in using magnets to correct compasses. Their disagreement is seen in two further letters: Fisher to Airy, 15 April 1859, and Airy to Fisher, 16 April 1859, both in CUL, RGO 6/689.

74 Airy to Fisher, 24 June 1841, CUL, RGO 6/585.

75 Airy to Fisher, 17 October 1861, CUL, RGO 6/1824.

76 Gould, op. cit. (7), 343.

77 The school had been founded by William and Mary under the 1694 charter for the Greenwich Hospital, with premises finally built in about 1716. Boys at the school were taught writing, arithmetic and navigation. See Macleod, N., ‘History of the Royal Hospital School’, Mariner's Mirror (1949), 35, 182–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar; H. D. Turner, The Cradle of the Navy: The Story of the Royal Hospital School at Greenwich and at Holbrook, 1694–1988, York, 1990.

78 Anon., op. cit. (2), 143. However, Turner's account of the school's history makes no reference to Fisher as headmaster in the list it provides, although there is a gap between 1856 and 1862; see Turner, op. cit. (77), 182.

79 Greenwich Hospital School, Board of Commissioners Minute Book, 5 February 1857, NA ADM 67/108.

80 Greenwich Hospital School, Board of Commissioners Minute Book, 7 February 1856, NA ADM 67/107.

81 Fisher to Airy, 25 January 1849, CUL, GRO 6/142.

82 Airy to Fisher, 25 January 1849, CUL, GRO 6/142.

83 Turner, op. cit. (77), 66–8.

84 Anon., op. cit. (2), 143.