Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:29:41.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Financial Management of the UK Pension Protection Fund

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2013

Abstract

The UK Pension Protection Fund (PPF) was established in April 2005 to protect the pensions of members of UK private sector defined benefit pension schemes which have insufficient assets and whose corporate sponsor fails. The Fund takes over the pension scheme assets and assumes responsibility for the payment of compensation to the former members of the scheme. The PPF is funded by a levy on the population of eligible schemes. This paper discusses the application of Enterprise Risk Management principles and techniques to the unique situation of the PPF. The elements of the financial management of the Fund have been developed by reference to practice within proprietary insurance institutions and within pension funds. The paper will be of interest and, we hope, of some value to students, researchers and analysts and also to the PPF's own stakeholder groups that have a stake in an effective pension protection regime.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, D., Cairns, A.J.G., Dowd, K. (2006). Living with mortality: Longevity bonds and other mortality-linked securities. British Actuarial Journal, 12, 153228.Google Scholar
Cairns, A.J.G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G.D., Epstein, D., Ong, A., Balevich, I. (2007). A Quantitative Comparison of Stochastic Mortality Models Using Data from England and Wales and the United States. Discussion Paper PI-0701, The Pensions Institute.Google Scholar
Clark, G.L., Urwin, R.C. (2007). Best-Practice Investment Management: Lessons for Asset Owners from the Oxford-Watson Wyatt Project on Governance. JEL D71, G12, G23, Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN INSURANCE AND OCCUPATIONAL PENSIONS SUPERVISORS (CEIOPS) (2009). Draft CEIOPS’ Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Articles 118 to 124 Tests and Standards for Internal Model Approval. CEIOPS-CP-56/09, CEIOPS.Google Scholar
Frankland, R., Smith, A.D., Wilkins, T., Varnell, E., Holtham, A., Biffis, E., Eshun, S., Dullaway, D. (2009). Modelling extreme market events. British Actuarial Journal, 15, 99217.Google Scholar
Fulcher, P., Baid, S., Chambers, A., Catchpole, S., Tatham, C., Rogers, M. (2007). Finance, Investment & Risk Management Board Working Party, The Actuarial Profession. Practical implementation of liability driven investment. Presented to the Finance, Investment and Risk Management Conference of the Actuarial Profession, June 2007.Google Scholar
Haberman, S., Day, C., Fogarty, D., Khorasanee, M.Z., Mcwhirter, M., Nash, N., Ngwira, B., Wright, I.D., Yakoubov, Y. (2003). A stochastic approach to risk management and decision making in defined benefit pension schemes. British Actuarial Journal, 9, 493618.Google Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D., Patel, C.C. (2011). Entity-wide risk management for pension funds. British Actuarial Journal, 17, 331394.Google Scholar
Shaw, R.A., Smith, A.D., Spivak, G.S. (2010). Measurement and modelling of dependencies in economic capital. British Actuarial Journal, 16, 601699.Google Scholar
Telford, P.G., Browne, B.A., Collinge, E.J., Fulcher, P., Johnson, B.E., Little, W., Lu, J.L.C., Nurse, J.M., Smith, D.W., Zhang, F. (2010). Developments in the management of annuity business. British Actuarial Journal, 16, 471551.Google Scholar
Urwin, R.C., Breban, S.J., Hodgson, T.M., Hunt, A. (2001). Risk budgeting in pension investment. British Actuarial Journal, 7, 319364.Google Scholar