Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T00:51:06.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of Pricing in the London Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

D.E.A. Sanders ,
A.N. Hitchcox  and
R. Manjrekar
D.E.A. Sanders
Affiliation:
Hymans Robertson, Hulton House, 161–166 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2DY, U.K. Tel: +44(0)171-831-9561; Fax: +44(0)171-450-4800
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Actuaries have become increasingly involved in general insurance, and in particular, in the London Market. This paper examines the management of the pricing process in the context of the London Market, and deals with concepts such as profit testing, risk and reward, and setting underwriting targets. The key area covered is the communication of a strategy in a meaningful way that can be controlled at the operating level.

Keywords

London MarketReinsurancePricingProfit TestingRisk and RewardUnderwriting TargetsAsset Liability Management
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , 01 August 1998 , pp. 427 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayling, D.E. (1984) . Underwriting decisions under uncertainty — the catastrophe market. Gower.Google Scholar
Bear, R.A. & Nemlick, K.J. (1990). Pricing the impact of adjustable features and loss sharing provisions of reinsurance treaties, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXVII.Google Scholar
Benktander, G. (1974). On the rating of a special stop loss cover. ASTIN.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. (1992). Introduction to ratemaking and loss reserving for property and casualty insurance. ACTEX.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. (1988). Minimum bias with generalised linear models. Proceedings of the Casualty-Actuarial Society, LXXV, 187–218.Google Scholar
Carriere, J.F. & Buhr, K.A. (1995). Valuation of catastrophe insurance contracts using compound poisson claim assumptions. ARCH, 1.Google Scholar
Christofides, S.et al. (1992). Storm rating in the nineties. GISG.Google Scholar
Clark, D.R. (1994). A simple tool for pricing loss sensitive features of reinsurance treaties. Casualty Actuarial Society Call Papers.Google Scholar
Cozzolino, J.M. & Mikolaj, P.J. (1994). Underwriting best shares of excess of layers. Casualty Actuarial Society Call Papers.Google Scholar
Czapiewski, C.J.W.et al. (1987). Practical pricing. GISG.Google Scholar
Czapiewski, C.J.W.et al. (1989). Risk exposure in the London Market. GISG.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, S.P. & Doherty, N.A. (1988). The financial theory of pricing property-liability insurance contracts. S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Daykin, C.D., Pentikäinen, T. & Pesonen, M. (1994). Practical risk theory for actuaries. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C. & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling of extremal events. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D.M.et al. (1989). An actuarial view of Lloyd's and the London reinsurance market. Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Herzog, T.N. (1992). Introduction to credibility theory. ACTEX.Google Scholar
Hogg, R.V. & Klugman, S.A. (1984). Loss distributions. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiln, R.J. (1982). Reinsurance in practice. Witherby.Google Scholar
Kiln, R.J. (1990). Reinsurance underwriting. DYP.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.S. (1988). The mathematics of excess of loss coverages and retrospective rating — a graphical approach. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXV.Google Scholar
Lirma (1994). The rating of pro-rata treaties.Google Scholar
Ludwig, S.J. (1991). An exposure rating approach to pricing property excess of loss reinsurance. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXVIII, 110–145.Google Scholar
Lyons, G.E.et al. (1993). Catastrophe XL. GISG.Google Scholar
Malde, S.et al. (1994). Marine insurance. GISG.Google Scholar
Miccolis, R.S. (1977). On the theory of increased limits and excess of loss pricing. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXIV.Google Scholar
Munich Re. (1990). Property insurance: data requirements for calculating correct premiums in insurance and reinsurance.Google Scholar
Panjer, H.H. & Wilmot, G.E. (1992). Insurance risk models. Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Patrik, G. (1990). ‘Reinsurance’ in The foundations of casualty actuarial science. Casualty Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Patrik, G. & Mashitz, I. (1990). Credibility for treaty reinsurance excess pricing. Casualty Actuarial Society Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Philbrick, S.W. (1985). A practical guide to the single parameter Pareto distribution. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXII.Google Scholar
Sanders, D.E.A. (1989). Option pricing and reinsurance. Proceedings of ASTIN Colloquium.Google Scholar
Sanders, D.E.A. (1993). When the wind blows, an introduction to catastrophe reinsurance. Proceedings of ASTI N Colloquium.Google Scholar
Sanders, D.E.A.et al. (1995). Pricing in the London Market. GISG.Google Scholar
Sanders, D.E.A.et al. (1996). Pricing in the London Market, Part 2. GISG.Google Scholar
Stanard, J.N. & John, R.T. (1990). Evaluating the effect of reinsurance contract terms. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Venter, G.G. (1990). ‘Credibility' in The foundations of casualty actuarial science. Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXVII.Google Scholar