Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:00:58.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legionary Tile Production in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2010

Peter Warry
Affiliation:
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, peter.warry@merton.oxon.org

Abstract

There are over two thousand legionary stamped tiles incorporating some two hundred different dies now admirably collated and listed in Roman Inscriptions of Britain. Dates have been tentatively suggested for a minority of these dies, but some of these are inconsistent with the other evidence. Inter alia, by using dating derived from the different forms of tegulae on which these stamps have been impressed, revised dating is proposed. Linking these dates with the distribution of the stamped tiles sheds new light on legionary practices and movements, particularly on Hadrian’s Wall and in post-Antonine Scotland, as well as the relationship between the legions and the auxiliary units. The multiplicity of different dies could be explained by each cohort having its own stamp and stamping every one of the tiles they produced, a practice that all the British legions seem to have followed. The discovery of legio XX stamped tiles referring to Viducius at a rural tile-works in Merseyside confirms him as a legionary contractor; close examination of tile sizes shows that contractors appear to have played a significant part in the production for at least two of the legions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abramson, P., Berg, D.S., and Fossick, M.R. 1999: Roman Castleford: Excavations 1974–85 Volume II: The Structural and Environmental Evidence, Yorkshire Archaeology 5, WakefieldGoogle Scholar
Betts, I.M. 1985: A Scientific Investigation of the Brick and Tile Industry of York to the Mid-Eighteenth Century, unpub. PhD thesis, University of BradfordGoogle Scholar
Betts, I.M. 1998: ‘The Roman tile’, in Cool, H.E.M. and Philo, C., Roman Castleford: Excavations 1974–85 Volume 1: The Small Finds, Yorkshire Archaeology 4, Wakefield, 225–32Google Scholar
Betts, I.M., Black, E.W., and Gower, J.L. 1997: A Corpus of Relief-patterned Tiles in Roman Britain, Journal of Roman Pottery Studies 7Google Scholar
Birley, A.R. 2005: The Roman Government of Britain, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blockley, K. 1989: Prestatyn 1984–5: An Iron Age Farmstead and Romano-British Industrial Settlement in North Wales, BAR Brit. Ser. 210, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Boon, G.C. 1984: Laterarium Iscanum — the Antefixes, Brick and Tile Stamps of the Second Augustan Legion, CardiffGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A.K. 1994: Life and Letters on the Roman Frontier; Vindolanda and its People, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R.J. 2009: ‘Caerwent: a Roman town’, Current Archaeology 226, 3845Google Scholar
Brodribb, G. 1987: Roman Brick and Tile, StroudGoogle Scholar
Caruana, I., and Hird, L. no date: ‘Roman tile and brick’, in Caruana, I., The Roman Forts at Carlisle: Excavations at Annetwell Street, 1973–84, unpub., 2736Google Scholar
Davies, J.L. 1993: ‘Stamped tile’, in Casey, P.J. and Davies, J.L. with Evans, J., Excavations at Segontium (Caernarfon) Roman Fort 1975–1979, London, 229331Google Scholar
Finley, M.I. 1985: The Ancient Economy, LondonGoogle Scholar
Frere, S.S. 1999: Britannia. A History of Roman Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Frere, S.S., and Tomlin, R.S.O. 1992: The Roman Inscriptions of Britain Volume II. Instrumentum Domesticum Fasc. 4. Wooden Barrels, Stilus Tablets, Miscellaneous Objects of Wood, Leather Objects, Occulists’ Stamps, Wallplaster, Mosaics, Handmills, Stone Tablets, Stone Balls, Stone Pebbles, Small Stone Votives, Miscellaneous Objects of Stone, Jet Figurine, Clay Figurines, Miscellaneous Clay Objects, Antefixes, Tile Stamps of Legion II Augusta, of Legion VI Victrix, of Legion IX Hispana, of Legion XX Valeria Victrix, Tile Stamps of the Auxiliaries, StroudGoogle Scholar
Frere, S.S., and Tomlin, R.S.O. 1993: The Roman Inscriptions of Britain Volume II. Instrumentum Domesticum Fasc. 5, Tile Stamps of the Classis Britannica; Imperial, Procuratorial and Civic Tile Stamps; Stamps of Private Tilers; Inscriptions on Releif-Patterned Tiles and Graffiti on Tiles, StroudGoogle Scholar
Fulford, M. 2008: ‘Nero and Britain: the palace of the client king at Calleva and imperial policy towards the province after Boudicca’, Britannia 39, 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, M., and Timby, J. 2000: Late Iron Age and Roman Silchester: Excavations on the Site of the Forum-Basilica 1977, 1980–86, Britannia Monograph 15, LondonGoogle Scholar
Grimes, W.F. 1930: Holt, Denbighshire: the Works Depot of the Twentieth Legion at Castle Lyons, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hassall, M.W.C., and Tomlin, R.S.O. 1989: ‘Roman Britain in 1988: Inscriptions’, Britannia 20, 327–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassall, M.W.C., and Tomlin, R.S.O. 2006: ‘Roman Britain in 2005: Inscriptions’, Britannia 37, 467–88Google Scholar
Haverfield, F. 1916: ‘Holt’, Archaeologia Cambrensis 16, 222–34Google Scholar
Holmes, N. 2003: Excavation of Roman Sites at Cramond, Edinburgh, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 23, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Jones, L.C. 2000: ‘Romano-British ceramic tile’, in Cowell, R.W. and Philpott, R.A., Prehistoric, Romano-British and Medieval Settlement in Lowland North West England — Archaeological Excavations along the A5300 Road Corridor in Merseyside, Liverpool, 92–4Google Scholar
Kurzmann, R. 2006: Roman Military Brick Stamps: A Comparison of Methodology, BAR Internat. Ser. 1543, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, I. 1997: ‘The Roman tile factory at Vransko near Celeia (Noricum), part one: excavation report’, Rei Cretariae Romanae Favtorvm Acta 35, 159–64Google Scholar
Newstead, R., and Droop, J. 1936: ‘Excavations in the Deanery Field and Abbey Green 1935’, Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 23, 350Google Scholar
Richmond, I.A. 1925: Huddersfield in Roman Times, HuddersfieldGoogle Scholar
Strickland, T.J. 1997: ‘What kind of community existed at Chester during the hiatus of the 2nd c.?’, in Goldsworthy, A. and Haynes, I. (eds), The Roman Army as a Community, Journ. Roman Arch. Supplement 34, 106–9Google Scholar
Swan, V.G., and McBride, R.M. 2002: ‘A Rhineland potter of the legionary fortress of York’, in Aldhouse-Green, M. and Webster, P. (eds), Artefacts and Archaeology: Aspects of the Celtic and Roman World, Cardiff, 190215Google Scholar
Swan, V.G., and Philpott, R.A. 2000: ‘Legio XX VV and tile production at Tarbock, Merseyside’, Britannia 31, 5567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, M. 1998: ‘Some finds from the Roman works-depot at Holt’, Studia Celtica 32, 4384Google Scholar
Warry, P. 2006: Tegulae: Manufacture, Typology and Use in Roman Britain, BAR Brit. Ser. 417, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R.B. 1985: ‘Excavations in Caernarfon 1976–77’, Archaeologia Cambrensis 134, 53105Google Scholar
Wilkes, J.J. 1979: ‘Importation and manufacture of stamped bricks and tiles in the Roman province of Dalmatia’, in McWhirr, A. (ed.), Roman Brick and Tile: Studies in Manufacture, Distribution and Use in the Western Empire, BAR Internat. Ser. 68, Oxford, 6572Google Scholar
Williams, D.F. 1987: ‘A note on the petrology of the stamped tile of the Second Augustan Legion from Seaton’, in Holbrook, N., ‘Trial excavations at Honeyditches and the nature of the Roman occupation at Seaton’, Devon Archaeological Society Proceedings 45, 72–3Google Scholar
Wright, R.P. 1965: ‘Roman Britain in 1964: Inscriptions’, Journ Roman Studies 45, 220–8Google Scholar
Wright, R.P. 1974: ‘Carpow and Caracalla’, Britannia 5, 289–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zienkiewicz, J.D. 1993: ‘Excavations in the “scamnum tribunorum” at Caerleon: The Legionary Museum Site 1983–5’, Britannia 24, 27140CrossRefGoogle Scholar