Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T16:14:04.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A two-year mirror-image study of the effect of treatment with paliperidone and aripiprazole long-acting injections on need for inpatient care and home treatment intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Shay-Anne Pantall*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Joseph Pilsbury
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Le Gan
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Lisa Brownell
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To evaluate the effect of the use of aripiprazole and paliperidone long acting injections on healthcare resource use

Background

Long acting injections of second-generation antipsychotics such as paliperidone and aripiprazole have become more commonly prescribed over the past decade. They have much higher acquisition costs when compared to first generation depot antipsychotics. It is therefore essential to demonstrate their tolerability and cost-effectiveness.

Method

We undertook an observational, retrospective two-year mirror study for all patients who started treatment with paliperidone long acting injection between January and June 2016 (n = 47) or aripiprazole long acting injection between April 2014 and July 2017 (n = 93). Clinical notes were examined to determine the number of admissions, inpatient days, home treatment episodes and number of home treatment days, in the 12 months preceding and following the commencement of the long acting injection.

Result

70% remained on paliperidone and 62% remained on aripiprazole at the end of the one-year period.

There was a significant reduction in occupied bed days in those treated with paliperidone from 78.2 days in the year before this treatment was started to 25.4 days in the year after (p = 0.002). There was a significant reduction in occupied bed days in those treated with aripiprazole from 66.51 days to 32.7 days (p = 0.0006).

There was no significant reduction in days spent under the care of home treatment teams for individuals treated with either of these medicines.

Conclusion

Treatment with either paliperidone or aripiprazole long-acting injection was associated with a reduction in admissions and occupied bed days of a magnitude that delivered an overall cost-saving despite the high drug acquisition costs. It remains to be determined how these reductions compare with other second-generation long-acting injections and first-generation depot antipsychotics.

Type
Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.