Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:27:17.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Therapeutic Patient Education for Severe Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Hafsa Meraj*
Affiliation:
Greater Manchester Mental Health Trust, Eccles, United Kingdom
Ahmed Waqas
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) aims to help patients self-manage their chronic condition over their lifetime, adapting to their evolving circumstances, as well as changes in their condition and treatment. The National Institute for Clinical and Healthcare Excellence underscores the importance of patient education as a crucial part of early interventions for mental disorders. This systematic review aimed to review TPE programmes in managing psychiatric disorders, considering the diversity in delivering agents, intervention formats, targeted skills, and therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

Comprehensive database searches, including Web of Science, PubMed, and COCHRANE, were conducted from September 2019 to January 2023, yielding 514 unique records, with 33 making it through rigorous evaluation for full-text review. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing on various psychiatric disorders such as depression, bipolar disorder, psychosis, and multiple serious mental illnesses. A total of 38 studies were included from our previous review to supplement the current database search.

Results

Among 49 included interventions, 13 were aimed at bipolar disorder, depression (n = 12), multiple serious mental illnesses and comorbidities (n = 11), schizophrenia and psychoses (n = 13). A total of 21 interventions were delivered in groups followed by individual (n = 12), mixed format (n = 14) and electronically (n = 2).

TPE programmes exhibited diversity in delivering agents and intervention formats, with a notable presence of multidisciplinary teams and various professionals. The interventions prioritized coping strategies and disease management techniques, though the extent varied based on the disorder. Examining the different skills imparted during the interventions, the focus predominantly leaned towards the teaching of coping strategies. These encompassed both cognitive and behavioural coping skills, including areas such as self-confidence (n = 37), stress management (n = 39), critical thinking (n = 26), problem-solving (n = 18), goal setting (n = 31), situational awareness (n = 36), and self-care (n = 36), with unspecified coping skills also noted (n = 32).

Effectiveness was heterogeneous across studies; some interventions showed significant benefits in areas such as symptom management, coping, and functional improvement, while others reported no significant outcomes.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the potential of TPE in psychiatric care, revealing its multifaceted nature and varied impact. TPE not only addresses deficits but also leverages patients' existing strengths and capabilities. Despite the reported benefits, a portion of the interventions lacked statistical significance, indicating the necessity for continuous refinement and evaluation.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.