Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T21:57:25.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey of junior doctors' perspective of serious incident reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Olusegun Popoola*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
Kuben Naidoo
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust
Amrith Shetty
Affiliation:
Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Serious incidents according to NHS England (2015) are incidents where the consequences to patients, families and carers, staff or organisations are so significant or potential for learning are so great that a heightened response is justified. There is anectoctal evidence that this process is potentially difficult for junior doctors and the primary purpose of learning may be lost due to the stress involved.

Our aim was to evaluate junior doctors perspective of serious incident reviews. A secondary aim was to organise local and regional workshops based on the outcome of our findings to address misconceptions around serious incident investigations.

Method

A survey was developed using survey monkey and distributed to all trainees across the Mersey region through the Medical Education teams.

The junior doctors range from core trainees to higher trainees. The survey encouraged the use of free texting if necessary.

Results from the survey were then analysed

Result

18 junior doctors across the 3 mental health Trusts in the Mersey region responded.

12 respondents have been involved in a serious incident investigation in the past and 9 of the respondents stated that they did not recieve any support during the process. Out of the 3 that were supported, one rated the support as poor and frightening.

55.56% af all respondents found the process of serious incident reviews hard to understand.

66% of all respondents admitted that they are aware that the purpose of the review is for learning purposes.

100% of respondents agreed that a workshop to discuss the purpose and process of serious incidents investigation to aid their understanding would be useful.

Conclusion

From the survey, we concluded that junior doctors do have some understanding of incident reviews process but they still do not feel comfortable with the idea of being under ‘investigation'.

It is also important that formal support is made available during the process.

We organised a workshop in one of the 3 Trusts which was well attended and junior doctors asked if they could sit on review panels for experiential learning. This is to be presented to govenance teams across the mental health trusts in the region.

Further workshop across the 2 remaining Trusts could not be organised due to COVID-19 pandemic.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.