Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T12:31:23.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Qualitative Analysis of Contributory Factors to Serious Incidents Involving Adults With Learning Disabilities Receiving NHS Mental Healthcare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Nusra Khodabux*
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
Reza Kiani
Affiliation:
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This study aimed to analyse contributory factors to serious incidents (SIs) involving adult patients with intellectual disabilities receiving NHS care in a mental health trust. People with intellectual disabilities face considerable preventable harm and disparities in care. In-depth analysis of contributory factors to incidents involving adults with an intellectual disability, using human-factors based frameworks is lacking. Individual SI reports contain useful data, but learning is often limited without aggregated analysis.

Methods

Thirty anonymized serious incident reports (2014–2023) from an NHS mental health Trust's intellectual disability service were analysed qualitatively using the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework, followed by reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) to identify patterns across the data. This enabled nuanced themes to emerge across errors at the sharp end and systems-level factors at the blunt-end.

Results

Across 30 reports, 606 discrete factors were identified. Situational factors such as behavioural escalations and staff competency gaps were most frequent (n = 187, 31%). Other factors included active failures, such as slips, lapses, mistakes, violations (n = 109, 18%), organisational influences (n = 107, 18%), communication breakdowns (n = 75, 12%), unfavourable working conditions (n = 62, 10%), cultural factors such as reluctance to voice safety concerns (n = 51, 8%), and external system factors (n = 15, 2%).

Using RTA, we identified recurring themes across incidents involving interactions between sharp-end human and blunt-end system factors, with broader issues shaping frontline performance. Patient marginalisation, excessive workloads, lack of resources, and cultures tolerant of shortcuts aligned to permit errors. Deficient coordination across fragmented healthcare systems and overdependence on non-permanent workers and bank staff obstructed comprehensive incident reviews. Failure to adequately probe cultural influences and external pressures further reflect the limited extent of investigational efforts.

Conclusion

Adults with intellectual disabilities are subject to serious incidents caused by interacting human and system-level factors, including organisational, cultural and external factors. Addressing under-resourcing and improving investigation quality are paramount to enhancing safety of care for people with intellectual disabilities.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.