Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T19:30:06.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psych for 6th: A Novel Schools Outreach Programme for Aspiring Medical Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Samyak Pandey*
Affiliation:
King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Eveliina Ilola
Affiliation:
King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Valerie Cai
Affiliation:
King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Tabea Winkler
Affiliation:
King's College London, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse toll on undergraduate medical education, resulting in less access to work experience opportunities for aspiring medical students, a vital component of the application process. With some studies reporting over 75% of work experience opportunities being cancelled due to COVID-19 restrictions, King's College London Psychiatry Society offered a unique chance for sixth-form students to experience a day in the life of a medical student, providing an authentic insight into the healthcare world. 'Psych for 6th' was a novel outreach programme offered to aspiring medical students in Year 12, helping them to better understand the style of learning in medicine through the lens of psychiatry. This aimed to raise their awareness of mental illnesses, prepare them for medical school applications and promote a career in psychiatry.

Methods

In March 2021, the King's College London Psychiatry Society committee members delivered two interactive sessions online via Microsoft Teams. Session 1 saw students discussing the philosophy of psychiatry and medicine, being taught basic history-taking skills, followed by a chance to practice these as a group with simulated patients.

Under the safeguarding of their teachers, the second session involved teaching Major Depressive Disorder to the pupils as if they were medical students, and then having the chance to take a complete psychiatric history in groups from simulated patients.

Results

Out of 16 students who took part, 11 students (69%) reported not being confident at all talking to a patient before the sessions. After participating in the sessions, 14 students (88%) felt confident talking to a patient. 15 (94%) reported considering psychiatry as a career in the future, with all 16 (100%) recommending these workshops to other schools. Qualitative feedback commended the encouragement of active participation, and how their perception of psychiatry has positively changed.

Follow-up with the students found that 14 (88%) of students mentioned this programme either in their personal statements or their medical school interviews.

Conclusion

The Psych for 6th programme has given a competitive edge to student applications, especially in light of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on work experience, and expanded students’ appreciation of mental health diagnoses and treatment.

Considering this was a school where over 90% of the pupils were from BAME backgrounds, these workshops have demonstrated that we have been able to put across a positive image of psychiatry, especially in communities where mental health disorders can carry a stigma.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.