Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:24:56.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenomenology of Mood Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Poornima Khadanga*
Affiliation:
Northampton, Northampton, United Kingdom
Sherina Moktan
Affiliation:
Patan Mental Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Eesha Sharma
Affiliation:
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India
Kommu John Vijaysagar
Affiliation:
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Psychiatrists frequently diagnose mood disorders in children. However, there is a limited understanding of clinical history and phenomenology of mood disorders in these phases of lifespan, and phenomenological variations in those with and without neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). The primary objective of the study was to study, comparatively, the phenomenology in children clinically diagnosed with mania, depression and mixed affective disorder. The second objective was to study the phenomenological differences in diagnosed cases of mood disorder children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders.

Methods

We conducted a semi-qualitative study of the clinical history and phenomenology in 120 children recruited from a tertiary care child and adolescent psychiatry service. Children with current diagnosis of depression, mania or mixed affective state, age less than 18 years, and appropriate consent/assent were included. Children with comorbid neurological disorders, any underlying organicity, or those currently in remission from their mood episode were excluded. Descriptive summaries were calculated for socio-demographic, clinical and phenomenological data. Chi Square test was used to examine statistical differences in prevalence of various phenomena across the clinical diagnostic groups.

Results

The most common clinical diagnosis was depression (58.3%) followed by mania (25.8%) and mixed affective state (15%). Irritable mood and emotional dysregulation were equally distributed among the three diagnostic groups. With a high prevalence of comorbid NDDs in the sample, we compared phenomena between groups with and without NDDs. In cases of depression, suicidal ideas and guilt feelings were expressed in 61% and 80% of these participants without comorbid NDD (n = 45) respectively, which was significantly high as compared with those with NDD (n = 67). The symptoms of disinhibition (78.9%), impulsivity (84.2%) and emotional dysregulation (10.5%) were more frequently seen in participants with neurodevelopmental disorder. Dissociative and obsessive phenomena were present in about a quarter of our study sample, similarly across mania, depression and mixed state.

Conclusion

Mental status examination of mood disorders in children suggests considerable phenomenological overlap with irritable mood, emotional and behavioural dysregulation, dissociative symptoms, obsessive symptoms, sleep disturbances, nightmares and hyperarousal seen in mania, depression and mixed states. These phenomena may, therefore, not be suitable in differentiating these clinical diagnoses. Children with NDDs may report lesser cognitive phenomena of depression, and the clinician may have to rely on the affective and behavioural manifestations of depression in clinical decision-making.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.