Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T00:58:09.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcomes of Pre-Existing Diabetes in People With/without New Onset Severe Mental Illness: A Primary-Secondary Mental Healthcare Linkage in South London, United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Nikeysha Bell*
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom
Gayan Perera
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom
Mark Ashworth
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences), London, United Kingdom
Matthew Boradbent
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom
Brendon Stubbs
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Fiona Gaughran
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Robert Stewart
Affiliation:
Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, United Kingdom South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To compare people with diabetes developing severe mental illness (SMI) to those with diabetes alone with respect to risk status, diabetes care receipt, and diabetes-relevant outcomes in primary care.

Methods

Data from mental health care (Clinical Record Interactive Search; CRIS) linked to primary care (Lambeth DataNet; LDN) were used. From patients with a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnosis in primary care, those with a new SMI diagnosis were matched (by age, gender, and practice) with up to five randomly selected controls. Mixed models were used to estimate associations with trajectories of recorded HbA1c levels; Poisson regression models compared total and cardiovascular comorbidity levels and number of diabetes complications; linear regression models compared BMI and total cholesterol levels; conditional logistic regression models investigated microalbuminuria, receipt of a foot or retinal examination, use of statins and receipt of insulin; Cox proportional hazards were used to model incident microvascular and macrovascular events, foot morbidity and mortality.

Results

In a cohort of 693 cases with SMI (122 bipolar disorder, 571 schizophrenia and related) and T2DM compared to 3366 controls, all-cause mortality was increased substantially in the cohort with SMI (adjusted hazard ratio 4.52, 95% CI 3.73–5.47; for bipolar 5.59, 3.37–9.28; for schizophrenia 4.42, 3.60–5.44). However, for all the other outcome comparisons, the only significant findings were of reduced foot examination (adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 0.54–0.98) and reduced retinal screening (0.77, 0.61–0.96).

Conclusion

Higher mortality suggests increased risk of adverse outcomes for people with pre-existing T2DM who develop SMI, and reduced foot/retinal examinations suggest disadvantaged healthcare receipt. However, other potential explanations for the mortality difference could not be identified from the outcomes analysed, so further investigation is needed into underlying causal pathways.

Type
Rapid-Fire Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.