Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:24:48.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Older Adults Mental Health (OAMH) Services Across Wales – A National Service Evaluation Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Amr Romeh*
Affiliation:
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom
Patrick Chance
Affiliation:
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom
Amrita Varanasi
Affiliation:
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Theoretically, OAMH services would be similar across all Welsh health boards but the reality can differ. To my knowledge, such data about OAMH services across Wales does not exist in a structured way. So I aim to explore these similarities/differences across different Welsh health boards.

Methods

A 20-question google forms survey was sent to 65 doctors from the seven Welsh health boards including long-term trust-grade doctors, middle-grade/SpRs and consultant psychiatrists. It is a box-ticking survey with comment fields for sharing potential thoughts.

Results

Response rate is 50.7% (33/65) with representation from all health boards. Consultants represent 72.2% of responses.

There is some variation in MDT members. Large variation shows in number of organic and functional beds. 33.3% have wards with mixed-type patients. 66.7% have separate wards for each cohort of patients. 30.3% have no inpatient duty but those who have (69.7%), show a varied number of inpatients. Only one sector has long-stay beds.

63.6% indicate that outpatient duty is divided into functional and memory services. Number of clinics differs hence varied numbers of patients.

57.6% have support of COTE on request, some have their regular attendance and some struggle to have their support. 66.7% indicate that care-coordinators are CPNs, otherwise they are OTs, social workers, psychologists or consultants.

75.8% find it better to have one team providing care for the same patient in the community and as inpatients; one major factor being continuity of care.

72.7% have medical students shadowing them in a structured way.

63.6% do not have specialized clinics in the community, others state they have clinics for lithium, clozapine, depot, S117 after-care, antipsychotic review, MCI or neuropsychiatry.

60.6% of liaison services are old-age specific. Some comments state that even in ageless services, they have an older adult psychiatry consultant. One comment states that there are designated nurses to each age group but the consultant is not “old-age trained”.

90.9% of memory services are run by psychiatric service; 9.1% by other departments.

Conclusion

Variations are not only across different health boards but also in-between sectors in each health board. Responses indicate variation in structure of inpatient, outpatient, liaison service and community specialized clinics. There are different levels of support from COTE. Structured medical students’ placements are shown in majority of responses. Finally, satisfaction of subconsultant-level doctors is clear by their wish to continue in the same field.

Type
4 Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.