Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T14:37:28.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Lost between the interface of physical and mental health”: focus groups exploring liaison psychiatry staff's perception about working during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Saima Jehanzeb*
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Muhammad Suleman
Affiliation:
Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Ella Tumelty
Affiliation:
Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Joanne Okusanya
Affiliation:
Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Laxsan Karunanithy
Affiliation:
Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Lucretia Thomas
Affiliation:
Medical School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Dhruba Bagchi
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Mahnaz Hashmi
Affiliation:
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, increasing attention is being drawn to the welfare of healthcare providers who have endured many months of sustained exposure to the virus, disrupted working conditions and psychological stress. This project aimed to explore the subjective experiences of staff working in Liaison Psychiatry (LP) in the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, (BSMHFT) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings have been used to devise recommendations for subsequent waves.

Method

Data collection occurred as part of a mixed method service evaluation project. We invited all clinical and non-clinical staff from LP departments across BSMHFT to participate in focus groups conducted via Microsoft Teams. The focus groups were video-recorded and facilitated by a moderator and an observer. Subsequent anonymised transcripts were coded and themes were generated by at least two evaluators, using thematic analysis.

Result

The focus groups, which ranged from 21 to 69 minutes, involved consultants, junior doctors and nurses from four hospitals within BSMHFT. Six major themes emerged including an initial reduction in number yet increase in acuity of patients seen by LP, with some perception that this resulted from reduced face-to-face contact with community mental health services. A feeling that LP was lost at the interface between the physical and mental health trusts emerged as another theme. Uncertainty in adapting to unprecedented working conditions, for example, unclear guidance concerning the use of personal protective equipment, was also described alongside anxiety about contracting and transmitting SARS-Cov-2. Additionally, increased pressure was felt due to staff shortages and inadequate inter-departmental communication. Participants reported differential uptake of remote working, as well as conflicting views regarding the feasibility of remote assessments in LP.

Conclusion

Liaison psychiatry staff within BSMHFT continued to provide a crucial service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus groups with thes staff indicate several recommendations for implementation within the Trust and provoke questions for future research. Due to the unique role that LP plays in providing mental health care within general hospitals, clear guidance for LP staff is key for effective service provision and supporting LP staff. Although used widely across community mental health services, the role of remote working in LP is contentious and requires further exploration. However, there are limitations to the use of focus groups and these findings may not fully represent the experiences of LP staff throughout BSMHFT. Different themes may have emerged through the use of anonymous questionnaires.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.