Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:25:32.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Junior Doctor's Ideas, Concerns and Expectations About Electroconvulsive Therapy: An Educational Quality Improvement Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Victoria Selwyn
Affiliation:
East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Julian Navanathan
Affiliation:
West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Rebecca Howard
Affiliation:
Princess Alexandra NHS Trust, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom
Yzobelle Barcelos*
Affiliation:
East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

There remains stigma surrounding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) amongst junior doctors, as well as gaps in knowledge, recent studies have shown. The aim of this study is to reduce stigma and negative biases towards ECT among junior doctors in Hertfordshire.

This research strives to improve clinical knowledge regarding ECT amongst the same population of junior doctors.

After highlighting stigma and gaps in clinical knowledge amongst junior doctors, we aimed to implement an educational intervention to reduce these and assess the impact it made.

Methods

Over 80 doctors ranging from foundation year 1 doctors to consultants attended a weekly academic teaching for doctors working in Psychiatry. A 50-minute slot was set aside for a teaching session on ECT.

This included a pre- and post-teaching anonymous questionnaire, with open and closed questions, asking junior doctors about their previous exposure to ECT, and asking them to list three words they associated with ECT.

The teaching session included: what ECT is, indications, side effects, a short video explaining the procedure, an open discussion about stigma and ECT, a brief overview about the future of neuromodulation, and a consultant psychiatrist who is part of the ECT team talking through the before, during, after, and answering questions from the participants.

Results

31 participants answered the pre-intervention questionnaire. Of the 31 respondents, 70% reported learning about ECT during medical school. However, 40% reported little teaching and only 13% had observed ECT. From thematic analysis of free text responses, 54% of respondents expressed detailed understanding of ECT, with 71% agreeing that ECT is a humane treatment. 80% expressed that ECT should be part of NICE guidelines. 50% of respondents conveyed that stigmatised portrayals of ECT in popular culture have influenced their negative opinion of ECT.

Of the 10 responses to the post-teaching questionnaire, 100% agreed that ECT is a humane treatment and that ECT should be part of NICE guidelines for treatment of severe/treatment-resistant depression. From thematic analysis, when asked to name 3 words they associated with ECT, 60% of participants described ECT as effective or successful and 40% described ECT as safe. 72% of the words used were positive descriptors.

Conclusion

ECT is not covered thoroughly during medical school. Before this teaching, about half of the trainees expressed a negative opinion of ECT due to popular culture. Post-teaching, positive opinions had increased, and more trainees (100%) agreed that ECT is a humane treatment and should be part of NICE guidelines.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.