Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:32:21.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IRAMP: Investigation of Risk Assessment and Management Processes Using Datix Report Analysis and Observation of Clinical Team Meetings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Kay Sunderland*
Affiliation:
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Emma Drysdale
Affiliation:
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Brian Gillatt
Affiliation:
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Alan Mackenzie
Affiliation:
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Paula McCahon
Affiliation:
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To investigate risk assessment and management processes across a health board in the context of the implementation of a new risk screening tool and risk policy using comparison of DATIX incidents before and after implementation of the CRAFT tool.

In mental health services, risk assessment and management are key responsibilities for clinical staff. A risk management tool that is structured and evidence-based aims to assist staff in managing risks including violence, self-harm, suicide and self-neglect.

It is not clear whether risk tools have clinical utility in influencing risk-related decision making and previous reviews within the health board indicated that risk policy was not being adhered to, prompting a review of the policy. Furthermore, policy recommends service user and carer collaboration with staff in all areas of mental health in Scotland but despite these recommendations there is little evidence to suggest they are routinely involved in risk assessment and management processes.

The present study is an opportunity to explore how teams think about and discuss risk management.

Methods

We looked at data on patient incidents that occurred over 30 months from 1/1/19 to 30/09/21. The Datix data were subdivided into five main categories: Violence & Aggression, Challenging behaviour, self-harm, absconding/missing and Suicide.

Results

Throughout the study period the category of Violence & Aggression was the most frequently reported Datix category for 28 out of 30 months, followed by Challenging Behaviour which was the second most frequent category for 22 out of 30 months and in the last year reports in this category have increased by 39.35%. The third most frequently reported category was self-harm and the fourth most reported category was Abscondment/Missing. The frequency of reports in this category increased over the study period.

The rate of suicide was consistently the lowest reported category and remained stable throughout the study period. With the exception of Violence and Aggression, all categories showed a general upwards trend in Datix report numbers.

Conclusion

We have seen an increase in significant incidents in all categories reported using the DATIX system with the exception of suicide and violence and aggression during the study period. This suggests that further work is required to ascertain the reasons for this and what impact, if any, the change in CRAFT risk assessment tool has had.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.