Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T00:11:14.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inpatient Psychiatry Placement Quality Improvement Project for Medical Students at University College London

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Maja Swirska*
Affiliation:
University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
Mustafa Abbas
Affiliation:
North London Mental Health Partnership, London, United Kingdom
Petros Lekkos
Affiliation:
North London Mental Health Partnership, London, United Kingdom
Suzanne Reeves
Affiliation:
University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom North London Mental Health Partnership, London, United Kingdom
Stephen Ginn
Affiliation:
University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom Central North West London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

UCL 5th year medical students undertake 3-week North London Mental Health Partnership inpatient psychiatric wards placements.

Before this project the management of these placements was at the discretion of individual ward teams. A varied, and potentially unsatisfactory, medical student experience resulted.

This project sought to implement a structured approach to placements.

Ward teaching best practice was, for the purposes of this project, considered to be (i) sending students a welcome email prior to placement, (ii) issuing placement timetable, (iii) using tutorial materials for onward tuition.

Project aims: 75% of wards sending welcome email, 75% issuing timetables, 75% using tutorial materials, 75% of students stating placement exceeded expectations.

Methods

This project consists of 1 PDSA cycle.

Prior to project baseline measures of ward teaching best practice were collected. The project started at the commencement of 2022/2023 academic year; duration: 12 weeks. The intervention was that inpatient medical teams were supported to send an introductory email to each student cohort, provide a placement timetable, and use supplied tutorial materials.

Questionnaires were emailed to inpatient medical teams at 6 and 12 weeks and to medical students at the end of placements. Medical team questionnaire covered engagement with best practice teaching. The student questionnaire addressed placement experience.

Results

Outcomes at project conclusion:

  • 33.3% of wards sent introductory email.

  • 66.7% of wards issued a placement timetable.

  • 16.7% of wards used tutorial materials.

  • Less than 75% of student reported that the placement exceeded expectations.

Student experiences were varied: from excellent to feeling ignored. Students expressed a strong preference for additional structured teaching.

The medical inpatient teams did not engage with this project as hoped. Feedback suggested reasons:

  • Lack of knowledge about the project.

  • Time pressures.

  • Perceived lack of medical student engagement.

  • Team had preferred teaching practices.

Conclusion

Despite this intervention, student inpatient placement experience remains varied.

It may have been optimistic to expect medical teams to change their established practice regarding medical students with only very modest additional support.

Some teams are enthusiastic and thoughtful about student teaching. Other are less so; this may be associated with temporary staff.

Following PDSA cycle 1 no further cycles were attempted as outcome suggested an alternative approach is required.

Possibilities for further PSDA cycles include:

  • Supporting placements via regular teaching-focused ward team meetings where expertise can be shared.

  • Appointing ward teaching fellows.

  • Explicitly rewarding inpatient teams displaying teaching excellence.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.