Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T00:08:03.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Communication at an In-Patient Female Forensic Intellectual Disability Unit – Delamere Ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Shelton Sibanda*
Affiliation:
Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Claire Lloyd
Affiliation:
Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Nathan Hunter
Affiliation:
Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Abigail Williamson
Affiliation:
Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To improve communication in a Female Forensic Intellectual Disability ward.

Methods

Delamere ward is a medium secure Intellectual Disability female forensic ward in Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust. Admitted patients have varying levels of need and complexities. A Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) comprising of Medical, Nursing, Support workers, Psychology, Occupational therapists and Speech and Language therapists, among others, works with patients in this ward. The MDT meets regularly in various patient meetings with decisions taken communicated to patients and staff through existing means. Communication was noted to be ineffective, leading to patient frequent challenging behaviours and patient dissatisfaction.

The Quality Improvement project was registered with the local Trust Quality Improvement Department at the outset. Staff views on ward communication effectiveness were gathered using entrance and exit questionnaires. 12 and 9 staff members responded to the entrance and exit questionnaires respectively.

The project was conducted over a period of 12 weeks and was divided into Service user and Staff led initiatives. Service user initiatives focused on strengthening existing community meetings, use of ward health promotion boards, MDT walk arounds and utilisation of ward areas. Staff initiatives included introduction of daily morning handover meetings, strengthening of existing staff meetings, listening sessions with staff, and use of reflective sessions. Daily handover meetings were open to the whole ward team and attended per staff availability. Ward dynamics encompassing the previous day were discussed and documented. Qualitative staff views transcribed and compared pre and post project.

Results

Implementation of the quality improvement project eased tension between the MDT and the wider team, helped foster more shared decision making, increased team participation, bridged the gap between fortnightly held ward rounds, created a platform for prompt information sharing, encouraged bidirectional flow of information and helped therapists plan their sessions accordingly.

Conclusion

Effective ward communication was beneficial to staff and patients alike, leading to better implementation of care plans, increased staff confidence and teamwork, and service user satisfaction.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.