Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:27:44.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Clozapine Prescribing at a London District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Jack Benson*
Affiliation:
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Tara Amin
Affiliation:
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Diana Shroff
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Kirsty Allen
Affiliation:
North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The liaison psychiatry team at North Middlesex Hospital (NMH) noticed that many patients on clozapine were missing doses in hospital, risking the need for re-titration and deterioration in mental state. Although clozapine is a widely used medication in psychiatry, non-psychiatric clinicians may not be aware of the importance of compliance. In addition, clozapine is often not widely available in acute medical hospitals and ascertaining the correct dosage can be difficult as it is not prescribed by the GP. Furthermore, clozapine can cause a variety of side effects that our medical colleagues may not be familiar with.

The aim of this project was to improve clozapine prescribing at NMH and improve communication with the liaison psychiatry team.

Methods

We reviewed the notes of 97 admissions in which patients were dispensed clozapine from the hospital pharmacy during the period April 2020 to December 2023 to determine what proportion had missed a dose of clozapine, and the clinical implications of this. We also reviewed the reasons for the missed doses to gather information on what could be done to improve patient safety.

From July 2022 we began implementing changes. This included the creation of a hospital guideline, putting in place an automatic email that would be sent to the liaison team when clozapine was prescribed, placing an alert on the online prescribing system to emphasise the importance of not omitting doses, and providing teaching to clinicians.

Results

We compared omissions of clozapine doses and referrals to the liaison team before and after changes were implemented. The percentage of patients inappropriately missing at least one dose fell from 67.4% to 31.1%. The proportion of patients who were referred to the liaison team rose from 40.8% to 89.2%.

We identified several recurring causes of missed doses. These included doctors not being aware of clozapine prescriptions or dosages, poor awareness that clozapine is a critical medicine and long stays in accident and emergency. There were also incidents where clozapine was stopped by the medical team without obtaining advice from psychiatric colleagues.

Conclusion

We were able to reduce the proportion of patients missing doses by improving awareness of clozapine compliance within the hospital. We were also able to improve communication between medical and psychiatric teams.

The clozapine guideline and prescribing alerts will continue to be utilised within the hospital. We plan to continue to provide regular teaching to rotational junior doctors and to pursue a similar project for lithium prescribing.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.