Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T06:37:03.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) Therapy for Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Delivered by Core Psychiatry Trainees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Dasal Abayaratne*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (STAIR) psychotherapy delivered by Core Psychiatry Trainees (CPTs) within the Sheffield Specialist Psychotherapy Service; a regional tertiary psychotherapy service for people with complex trauma and personality difficulties.

STAIR is a manualised evidence-based skills-based psychotherapy for people with Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (cPTSD) awaiting trauma processing that is deliverable by a range of qualified and non-qualified staff. It was introduced to address two key difficulties the service faces: a long waiting list for trauma processing potentially contributes to patient deterioration, and a difficulty in identifying suitable cases for CPT short psychotherapy case requirements given the majority of potential patients awaited longer term psychotherapy.

Methods

A modified STAIR protocol was developed to meet the requirements of CPTs.

A 1-year prospective evaluation was used to compare pre and post patient reported outcome measures. These include the Nine item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) for depression symptoms, Impacts of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) for trauma symptoms, Recovering Quality of Life – 10 question (ReQoL-10) for quality of life, and the Short form Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32) for relational symptoms. Descriptive statistics were used and data analysed using repeated measure t-tests.

Results

17 patients completed STAIR delivered by CPTs. There was statistically significant mean improvement in Quality of Life (p = 0.001), trauma symptoms (p = 0.009) and depression symptoms (p = 0.019). Mean ReQoL-10 and IES-R improvements additionally met criteria for reliable change. There was non-significant (p = 0.0146) improvement in relational symptoms measured by IIP-32.

Conclusion

This evaluation demonstrates promising patient outcomes from STAIR delivered by CPTs for people with Complex PTSD awaiting trauma processing. This may help both negate any potential deteriorations whilst awaiting therapy, as well as prepare patients. Further evaluations could focus on acceptability and outcomes for CPTs.

Whilst the nature of this small evaluation limits further interpretation and generalisability, this pathway offers a promising means of meeting CPT psychotherapy competencies whilst also improving outcomes for patients.

Type
4 Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.