Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T11:56:43.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-morbid gambling disorder in a local drug and alcohol service: an audit to determine prevalence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

John Barker*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust
Ruta Rele
Affiliation:
Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust
Charlotte Cartwright
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield
Bethany Dinsdale-Young
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

National surveys show that over 56% of adults in England gamble annually, and of those surveyed, 0.5% were problem gamblers, equating to 300,000 problem gamblers at any point. The prevalence of problem gambling in patients with a substance misuse disorder ranges from 20.5% to 55%.

The audit aims to improve the care of patients with comorbid substance misuse and gambling disorder by assessing the extent to which the service currently enquires about and records problem gambling in its patient cohort.

It is hypothesised that as no formal recording process is in place locally, this information will not be recorded systematically and in a way that is easily retrievable by the service.

The audit will allow the service to assess whether changes need to be made to the initial assessment pathways into treatment for substance-related disorders to adequately record this information so that further assessment and onward referral can take place.

Method

All active patients (n = 2824) within the service had both their electronic initial assessments and their entire electronic notes screened for terms such as ‘betting’ and ‘gambling’ and this was recorded using an Excel spreadsheet. Prevalence rates across the teams (opiates, non-opiates and alcohol) were then calculated.

Result

The results showed that 0% of patients had any entries in their initial screening noting any gambling activity. Further scrutiny of the records revealed that only 3.5% (n-99) had ever discussed gambling with a worker in any of the services.

Conclusion

The majority (n = 52) of patients who had discussed gambling only had one positive search result, suggesting this was not followed-up in a systematic fashion. Recommendations are to revise the common assessment pro-forma to include a validated brief screening tool (lie/bet), where one positive answer triggers a further assessment with an appropriate clinician for consideration of referral to the local NHS gambling service.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.