Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T01:50:16.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-Development of a Bereavement Support Program for Parents With Lived Experience of Stillbirth or Neonatal Death in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Subia Naz
Affiliation:
Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Tazeen Ali
Affiliation:
Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Nasim Chaudhry*
Affiliation:
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
Nusrat Hussain
Affiliation:
University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Tracey Mills
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Rates of stillbirth and neonatal deaths are high in low- and middle-income countries including Pakistan and these are one of the most stressful life-events for parents and families. Society does not appropriately recognize perinatal loss and support from healthcare professionals is often very limited or non-existent in Pakistan. Therefore, we aimed to co-develop and assess the feasibility of a bereavement support program for parents who experienced stillbirth/neonatal death in a public health facility in Pakistan.

Methods

This study adopted a sequential mixed-method design. The first phase involved co-development of a bereavement support program through a consensus process involving multidisciplinary health professionals, stakeholders and parents with previous experience of perinatal death (n = 23) using the Nominal Group Technique. Phase 2 includes a feasibility assessment using before and after cohort design. Sixty women (30 per phase) with recent experience of stillbirth and/or neonatal death will be recruited, from a public hospital in Pakistan. The main outcome measures will include recruitment and retention and acceptability of the study processes and data collection.

Results

Following the consensus process, agreed intervention components included an educational workshop for healthcare staff, creation of a bereavement champion group of health workers in the facility and offering post-natal telephone peer support to bereaved mothers. The educational component for healthcare staff includes Advance Bereavement Care (ABC) workshop for all staff and bereavement champions (n = 15 healthcare workers) who later received one day's training and one-day training refresher. This component aims to improve care, act individually and as a group to identify areas for development, encourage good practice and support colleagues. The peer support component includes telephone support provided by women with previous experience of perinatal death (n = 7) trained by the research team. Supervision arrangements are in place for champions and peer supporters. The feasibility study is ongoing.

Conclusion

The co-development process ensured the cultural relevance of both components of the bereavement support program. The process also contributed to improving the sense of ownership by healthcare facility. Feasibility study will confirm whether parents are willing to take part, acceptability and whether future research to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on improving care after SB/NND is feasible.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.