Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T14:13:57.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Chicken or the Egg? Understanding the Temporal Relationship Between Severe Mental Illness and Neurological Conditions in a UK Primary Care Cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Ella Burchill*
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Jonathan Rogers
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
David Osborn
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Joseph Hayes
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Naomi Launders
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

A significantly higher prevalence of neurological conditions has been found both before and after a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychotic illnesses compared with the general population.

We aimed to understand the cumulative prevalence of 16 neurological conditions in people with severe mental illness (SMI) from 5 years before to 5 years after their SMI diagnosis. We hypothesised that individual neurological conditions would have differential temporal relationships relative to SMI diagnosis.

Methods

In a longitudinal matched study, we identified a cohort of patients aged 18–100 years from Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2018, from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Neurological conditions were classified using ICD–11 criteria into umbrella clusters of disease. Outcome of interest was a diagnosis of SMI. Each SMI patient was matched 1:4 to patients without SMI in the CPRD cohort, matching for sex, 5-year age band, primary care practice and year of practice registration. The cumulative prevalence of 16 neurological conditions was recorded cross-sectionally at 5, 3, 1 years prior to SMI diagnosis, at SMI diagnosis (index), and 1, 3 and 5 years after SMI diagnosis. Logistic regression modelling aided comparison of differential prevalence of neurological conditions, adjusting for sociodemographic variables, and with further adjustment for body mass index, smoking, alcohol and non-prescription drug use. Multiple imputation was applied in cases of missing data.

Results

We identified 68,789 patients with SMI, matched to 274,827 controls. The median age was 40.9 years, 49.05% of the overall cohort were female (33,783 SMI patients, 134,740 controls), and the majority were of White ethnicity (35,228, 51.2% SMI patients, 125,518, 45.7% controls). The most prevalent neurological conditions across seven timepoints were cerebral palsy, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, paralysis and Parkinson's disease. Conditions with the highest fully adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for SMI diagnosis were dementia 3 years after SMI diagnosis (5.32, 95% CI 4.95–5.71) and Parkinson's disease 5 years after SMI diagnosis (4.26, 95% CI 3.68–4.94).

Conclusion

All 16 neurological conditions have higher prevalence in the SMI cohort compared with controls, with different prevalence patterns observed over the 10-year study period. A consistently lower OR for schizophrenia compared with other SMI warrants further exploration, as neurological conditions risk being under-recorded.

A greater understanding of the temporal relationship between SMI and neurological conditions may help promote earlier diagnosis, increased screening and better holistic management of both conditions.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.