Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:30:31.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Case of Overlapping Extrapyramidal Side Effects and Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Jun Hua Phan*
Affiliation:
Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Kainechukwu Ugwu
Affiliation:
Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Sally Li Er Fong
Affiliation:
Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction to medications, specifically dopamine receptor antagonists. We report a case of a patient who initially developed extrapyramidal side effects (EPSE) and subsequently developed NMS after being treated with flupentixol depot.

Methods

A 64-year-old woman with an underlying recurrent depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms presented to a psychiatric hospital in June 2023. She exhibited self-neglect, low mood, paranoid delusions, and non-concordance to oral psychiatric medications.

In the first week, she declined all oral medications and was subsequently started on flupentixol decanoate (Depixol) depot injection at 40 mg once every 2 weeks. While showing good improvements in her mental state, she began complaining of akathisia and dystonia since July 2023, consistent with extrapyramidal side effects secondary to flupentixol.

The symptoms improved by lowering flupentixol to 30 mg every 2 weeks and adding procyclidine 5 mg twice daily and propranolol 20 mg three times daily.

In early September 2023, she experienced severe restlessness, stiffness, muscle weakness and felt hot and clammy over 36 hours. Physical observations showed fever, tachycardia, and hypertension. Examination revealed diaphoresis, rigidity in both upper and lower limbs, lower limb weakness, and normal reflexes. Blood tests indicated acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 1, deranged liver function tests, and a creatinine kinase (CK) level of 9405.

She was promptly admitted to the medical hospital for NMS and received extensive intravenous fluid rehydration along with oral Dantrolene. She made a complete recovery, and Depixol was discontinued. Two weeks later, she was started on quetiapine and gradually titrated to 50 mg once daily.

Results

EPSE and NMS are associated with dopamine receptor blockade and commonly occur during the initiation or dosage increment of neuroleptic medications.

NMS is rare but life-threatening, presenting with manifestations of muscle rigidity, pyrexia, altered mental status, sympathetic nervous system lability and elevated CK.

In our case, our patient, who recently started taking neuroleptic medication, experienced EPSE and later deteriorated acutely, raising a high suspicion of NMS. It is essential to consider other possible diagnoses, including serotonin syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, malignant catatonia and electrolyte disturbances.

The commonly used diagnostic criteria include Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Levenson's criteria but diagnosis of NMS remains clinical.

The crucial step after identifying NMS is to immediately stop the neuroleptic agent, followed by supportive medical treatment.

Conclusion

Early recognition and prompt treatment of NMS in our patient led to a full recovery.

Type
6 Case Study
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.