Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:36:25.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Clinician Compliance With DVLA Guidelines for Psychiatric Inpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Samuel Yale*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Anastasiia Redko
Affiliation:
The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Mental health conditions have wide ranging impacts on individuals, including in their ability to safely drive. Attention, impulse control, judgement, and psychomotor reaction times are some of the ways in which mental health conditions and psychotropic medications impair ability to drive. To ensure safety of patients and other road users, the Driving and Vehicle Licencing Agency (DVLA) provides guidance to clinicians and patients regarding fitness to drive. The General Medical Council (GMC) also states that doctors have a duty to inform patients that their condition and/or medication can impact driving ability.

To evaluate compliance with DVLA and GMC guidelines, an audit was conducted to assess: 1) whether patients’ driving status was established; 2) whether patients were advised to inform the DVLA; and, 3) whether they were advised to inform their insurance company. This was subsequently re-audited after introducing recommendations to improve compliance.

Methods

Each audit cycle reviewed the 30 most recent discharges from an adult general psychiatry inpatient unit before and after intervention. Online notes, multi-disciplinary team (MDT) minutes and discharge summaries were reviewed to assess whether the above criteria were met. Following the initial audit cycle, results were presented at Trust-wide teaching, and driving status was added to an MDT template as a prompt to discuss this with patients. A second cycle was completed four months afterwards.

Results

Results of the first cycle (pre-intervention) showed driving status was established in 73% (n = 22) of patients. Of the drivers, 90% (n = 9) were advised to tell the DVLA, whilst only 9% (n = 1) were advised to tell their insurance company. Post-intervention, 67% (n = 20) of patients had driving status established, whilst 100% (n = 11) of drivers were subsequently advised to inform the DVLA, and 64% (n = 7) advised to tell their insurance company.

Conclusion

Clinicians have a legal and ethical duty to discuss driving status with patients. Failure to do so could have significant consequences on both individual and wider public safety. This audit showed that in clinical practice, key legal requirements were not being fulfilled. Whilst staff education and changes to MDT templates increased the number of drivers being advised to tell the DVLA and insurers, it had little impact on establishing driving status. Therefore, further changes were made to the discharge letter template to remind staff to assess patients’ driving status, and to enable community team follow-up. A third cycle of the audit is currently ongoing to evaluate this change.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.