Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:27:44.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Evaluation of the High Dose Antipsychotic Therapy Patients on the General Adult Inpatient Wards and the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust – Is Clozapine Being Considered in Each Case?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Declan Hyland*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Roopa Singh
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Kerry Dainton
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

High Dose Antipsychotic Therapy (HDAT) should only be used in exceptional circumstances, as there is little evidence to suggest that higher than recommended doses of antipsychotics are more clinically effective than standard doses, with potential side effects being greater. In practice, there are several clinical scenarios where HDAT may be prescribed and the potential benefits must outweigh the potential risks. NICE guidelines for psychosis and schizophrenia advise that dosages outside the range given in the British National Formulary should be justified and recorded.

This audit aimed to determine whether the option of clozapine is being considered in those patients on the 16 general adult inpatient wards and Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust who are prescribed HDAT.

Methods

A list of all inpatients admitted to the 16 general adult inpatient wards and to the PICU in the Trust between 17th and 20th of July 2023 was obtained. The electronic prescription record for each patient was scrutinised to determine whether the patient was subject to HDAT and, if so, whether there was documentation in the patient's electronic record that the option of treatment with clozapine was considered. The authors also wished to determine whether, in those HDAT patients in whom clozapine was considered, the rationale for it not being pursued as a treatment option was documented.

Results

29 inpatients on the 16 general adult wards and on the PICU were prescribed HDAT. In 9 (39%) of the HDAT patients, the option of treatment with clozapine was considered. It was documented for 6 of the HDAT patients that the option of clozapine was not applicable. Of the 9 HDAT patients that had a trial of clozapine considered, all of them had documented evidence of the decision in their electronic record. Four of the 9 patients accepted the trial of clozapine, 5 did not accept/it was deemed not appropriate. Of the 5 patients who did not accept the trial of clozapine or were deemed not appropriate, the rationale was documented for each patient.

Conclusion

Given the lack of recommendation and evidence base to prescribe HDAT, the option of clozapine, if appropriate, should always be considered in any patients in whom HDAT is being considered or required. There may be barriers to clozapine being chosen – both patient-related and clinician-related. Any such barriers should be explored and addressed to ensure that treatment-resistant patients are commenced on clozapine without unnecessary delay.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.