Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:28:37.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audit of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Risk Assessment in an NHS Trust Mental Health Inpatient Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Manjula Atmakur
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Sururat Ibrahim*
Affiliation:
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
Oluwakemisola Adedipe
Affiliation:
Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To assess compliance with National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance (NG 89) recommendations on VTE risk assessment for mental health inpatients in Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (BCHFT).

Methods

NICE guidance (NG89) set out recommendations on VTE risk assessment for adult psychiatric inpatients. It recommends that:

  • All adult psychiatric inpatients have their VTE risk assessed as soon as possible after admission or at the first consultant's review.

  • All patients have their VTE risk re-assessed at the point of consultant's review or if their clinical condition changes.

  • Any patient found to be at VTE risk should be considered for prophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin III (LMWH III), if the thrombotic risk outweighs the bleeding risk. Fondaparinux sodium should be considered in those with contraindications to LMWH III.

  • VTE pharmaco-prophylaxis should be continued until the patient is no longer at increased VTE risk.

Using these recommendations as standards, we retrospectively evaluated inpatient clerking charts and progress notes of 49 inpatients across all the 23 wards in the Trust. Data were collected using a standardised audit tool on concordance with these standards to check how many patients had VTE risk assessment within 24 hours of their admission, whether patients had VTE risk re-assessment at any point during admission, whether the patients found to have increased VTE risk at admission were commenced on pharmaco-prophylaxis. Data was also collected to see if the patients commenced on VTE pharmaco-prophylaxis were re-assessed for continued need of the prophylaxis.

Results

30 patients (59.2%) were risk assessed for VTE within 24 hours of admission. Only 2% of patients had VTE re-assessment while on admission, but there was no record of the indication for this. All the 3 patients (6.1%), found to be at VTE risk on admission, were prescribed pharmaco-prophylaxis, but none of them had a VTE re-assessment to determine the prophylaxis’ continued need.

Conclusion

The trust’s compliance with NICE recommendation for VTE risk assessment is below standard. We felt the trust's compliance is a reflection of the medical staff's awareness on the importance of VTE risk assessment in mental health settings, and also lack of Trust's policy on VTE risk assessment. Recommendations were suggested to include VTE risk assessment in the junior doctors’ induction programme and for the trust to have a VTE policy that factors in mental health risk factors.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.