Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:28:38.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Audit of Baseline Physical Health Monitoring in Patients Under the Care of Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust Who Are Commenced on Lithium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Declan Hyland*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Gopal Chinnari
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Tawfik Elhaj-Houssen
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Rose-Anne Orrell
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Lithium is clinically indicated for use in the UK for treatment and prophylaxis of mania, treatment and prophylaxis of bipolar disorder, treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent depressive disorder and treatment and prophylaxis of aggressive or self-harming behaviour. Prior to commencing lithium, there is a need for several physical health checks and blood tests to be completed to ensure that lithium remains appropriate to prescribe.

This audit aimed to establish whether Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust’s prescribing practices of lithium are in keeping with national guidance prior to initiation and how the Trust’s performance compared with national performance as identified by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health (POMH) lithium audit.

Methods

A total of 127 patients under the care of the Trust who were prescribed lithium (lithium carbonate and lithium citrate, tablet and liquid formulations) were identified using the Trust's electronic record system and electronic prescription chart system. The POMH lithium audit tool was used to capture data for each lithium patient as Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust was participating in the national POMH lithium audit. Each patient's electronic record was scrutinised to determine whether the following were measured prior to lithium being initiated – weight/body mass index (BMI)/waist circumference, Thyroid Function Tests (TFTs), serum calcium level and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR).

Results

Of the sample of lithium patients included in the audit, 78% of patients had a weight/BMI/waist circumference done prior to initiation of lithium; 80% of patients had a serum calcium level; 93% had TFTs done; and 100% of patients had an eGFR completed prior to initiation of lithium.

Conclusion

The results of this audit indicate that the Trust is performing well with the required physical health monitoring prior to initiation of lithium. Trust performance for all four parameters that were included and assessed in this audit were above the national compliance level reported in the POMH lithium audit. There is clearly a need, however, to improve performance and to ensure that both medical and nursing staff across the Trust are aware of the physical health monitoring required before initiating any patient on lithium. A Quality Performance Alert will be sent to all medical and nursing staff to raise awareness and lithium monitoring will be included in the induction for junior doctors working in the Trust. Future auditing of Trust performance on required physical health monitoring prior to commencing lithium will be conducted.

Type
5 Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.