Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:20:35.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Admissions to the National Forensic Mental Health Service Anteceding and Succeeding Its Relocation: A Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study (D-FOREST)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Muhammad Umer Iqbal*
Affiliation:
Dundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Central Mental Hospital, National Forensic Mental Health Service, Portrane, Ireland
M. Umer Waqar
Affiliation:
Dundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Central Mental Hospital, National Forensic Mental Health Service, Portrane, Ireland
Harry G Kennedy
Affiliation:
Dundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Mary Davoren
Affiliation:
Dundrum Centre for Forensic Excellence, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Central Mental Hospital, National Forensic Mental Health Service, Portrane, Ireland
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The Central Mental Hospital is the Republic of Ireland's only secure forensic hospital and the seat of its National Forensic Mental Health Service (NFMHS). We scrutinised admission patterns in the NFMHS during the period 01/01/2018–01/10/2023; before and after relocating from the historic 1850 site in Dundrum to a modern facility in Portrane on 13/11/2022.

Methods

This prospective longitudinal cohort study included all patients admitted during the above period. The study initially commenced in Dundrum and continued afterwards in Portrane. Data gathered included demographics, diagnoses, capacity to consent to treatment, and the need for intramuscular medication (IM) after admission. Therapeutic security needs and urgency of need for admission were collated from DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 scores rated pre-admission. Hours spent in seclusion during the first day, week, and month after admission were calculated. Data were collected as part of the Dundrum Forensic Redevelopment Evaluation Study (D-FOREST).

Results

There were 117 admissions during the 69-month period. The majority were male (n = 98). Most were admitted from prisons (87%). Schizophrenia was the most common diagnosis (55.8%). Mean DUNDRUM-1 triage security scores were in the medium-security range (2.84–3.15) during this period. At the time of admission, 53.8% required seclusion, 25.6% required IM medication, and 79.5% lacked capacity to consent to treatment. Those who required seclusion on admission had worse scores on the DUNDRUM-2 triage urgency scale (F = 20.9, p < 0.001). On linear logistic regression, the most parsimonious model resolved with five predictors of hours in seclusion during the first day and week, which were: D1 item 8 – Victim sensitivity/public confidence issues, D1 item 10 – Institutional behaviour, D2 item 2 – Mental health, D2 item 4 – Humanitarian, and D2 item 6 – Legal urgency. 50% required IM medication during their first week of admission and these patients had significantly worse scores on: D1 item 8 – Victim sensitivity/public confidence issues, D1 item 10 – Institutional behaviour, D2 item 2 – Mental health, and D2 item 4 – Humanitarian (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was an increase in the frequency of admissions since relocating to Portrane. The results suggest that there was no change in overall triage security and urgency needs during the time period in question. Major mental illness related factors impacted the need for seclusion early in the admission, whereas factors linked to prison behaviour or personality-related factors were more associated with an ongoing need for seclusion at month one.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.