Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:25:05.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adherence to RCPsych Standards for Physical Health Monitoring and Health Promotion in Patients Open to the North Wales Early Intervention Psychosis (EIP) Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Zeenish Azhar  and
Javier Mendieta
Zeenish Azhar*
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
Javier Mendieta
Affiliation:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

  • • The audit aims to improve the quality of physical health monitoring and physical health interventions that the EIP service provides to people with psychosis.

  • • To ensure adherence to RCPsych standards for physical health monitoring in patients with First Episode Psychosis.

  • • To ensure adherence to RCPsych standards for provision of required physical health interventions and health promotion in patients with First Episode Psychosis.

Methods

  • • A retrospective case note audit and re-audit was conducted for 13 patients on the caseload of the North Wales EIP service from December 2022 to December 2023.

  • • The case notes were audited against RCPsych standards for physical health monitoring and physical health interventions using an adapted version of the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP) audit tool.

Results

  • • Alcohol and substance misuse screening status improved to 100% in re-audit.

  • • There was significant improvement noted in Hypertension, Body Mass Index and Cholesterol screening.

  • • Mental health medication review, advice or referral for diet and exercise with regards to weight gain/obesity and hypertension improved to 100%.

  • • No specialist interventions were offered around health promotion and illness prevention as most of the patients were either not in the abnormal range, identified as high risk for developing the above mentioned physical health conditions or refused to have interventions for these conditions.

  • • A definite increase was observed in frequency of interventions being reviewed and reoffered for those accepting and declining interventions at baseline.

Conclusion

  • • Training for staff to complete bloods and physical health screening.

  • • Increase availability of equipment to carry out physical health screening.

  • • Monthly, three and six monthly prompts in the case notes for staff to discuss physical health interventions with patients.

  • • Staff to use headings for physical health screening and interventions to improve documentation in case notes.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 10 , Supplement S1: Abstracts from the RCPsych International Congress 2024, 17–20 June , June 2024 , pp. S127
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.