Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:19:22.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Acceptability of Yoga as a Family Intervention: Using Family Journals as a Data Collection Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Hayley Graves*
Affiliation:
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Hannah Merdian
Affiliation:
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Sharron Smith
Affiliation:
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Kirsty Miller
Affiliation:
University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The number of children and young people across the UK experiencing mental health difficulties is rising, with 1 in 6 young people aged 6–16 with a diagnosable mental health condition.

The school environment can be a crucial setting for mental health promotion as it can reach such a large number of young people.

The application of mindfulness for wellbeing is becoming increasingly popular. Research demonstrates mindfulness is an effective treatment for many psychological conditions and adding a yoga element is thought to bring additional benefits.

Interventions focusing on wellbeing are found to demonstrate more consistent improvements when parents are involved, supporting the concept of a family intervention.

A 6 week family intervention was developed specifically for children, to promote overall wellbeing.

Aim:

  1. 1. To ascertain the acceptability of yoga as a family intervention.

  2. 2. To ascertain the acceptability of family journals as method to collect data.

Methods

  • 6 weekly, 1hr, yoga and mindfulness intervention.

  • 9 children aged 6–11, 9 adults.

  • A weekly family journal was used collect data.

  • Data from the journals were analysed using Thematic Analysis.

  • A Linear Numeric Scale was used pre and post intervention rating 1–5: asking the participants to rate their confidence in relation to breathing techniques, yoga, working as part of a group, and understanding mindfulness.

Results

1. Acceptability of yoga as a family intervention

Results from the pre post tests, indicate a significant relationship between the intervention and the participants.

Confidence in yoga P < 0.008 (mean pre test 1, post test 4).

Confidence with breathing P < 0.008 (mean pre test 3, post test 5).

Confidence with mindfulness P < 0.004 (mean pre test 1, post test 4).

Working as part of a group P < 0.004 (mean pre test 3, post test 5).

2. Acceptability of family journals as a method to collect data

The journals provided sufficient qualitative responses and meaningful quantitative data to consider the intervention acceptable. The weekly logs in the family journals were thematically analysed and four key themes were identified as having a positive impact: yoga, breathing techniques, mindfulness activities, improved connection.

Conclusion

This study has highlighted promising findings relating to yoga as a family intervention.

Families reported applying the techniques, outside of the sessions to manage emotions. The family journals were a space where adults had the freedom to choose what they wrote, this method allowed us to identify the intervention had a positive impact upon family connections. Using the journals was a simple way to capture the voices of the participants.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.