Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T05:12:21.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revisiting neuropsychiatry as a psychiatric discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2018

Jack C. Lennon*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Illinois School of Professional Psychology, USA; email: jlennon11@live.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2018

There has been a long-standing debate around the merging of disciplines, owing not to a lack of necessity in multidisciplinary approaches, but the increase in specialisation and fear of each field losing its perceived uniqueness. FitzgeraldReference Fitzgerald1 made this clear in his remarks regarding how neuropsychiatry can possess that which is both neurology and psychiatry. In a strong refutation, DattaReference Datta2 stated with vigour that while psychiatry could be improved with greater knowledge of behavioural neurology and neurosciences, it is unique in its approach. This rebuttal seems to have touched on a view of the psyche that may be one specific to psychiatry and psychology, but it cannot escape the organ from which these cognitions spontaneously arise.

It is clear that behavioural neuroscience is the foundation of psychiatry, an unassailable statement with which DattaReference Datta2 agreed. Fitzgerald's editorial,Reference Fitzgerald1 however, does not necessarily minimise or underappreciate the importance of psychiatry in managing presentations such as suicidality from psychosocial perspectives, which a neurologist, for example, would not have the training to assess and treat. Instead, this editorial seems to serve an explicit purpose – to identify how specialisation in these specific circumstances may actually harm the field of psychiatry. It can be seen in the present day that psychiatry is stigmatised as much as the disorders it treats – it has been viewed as an intentional deviation from neurology, which is well known to treat organic disorders of the brain. A lack of merger, then, serves to ostracise psychiatry insofar that it becomes less about the brain. To state that discussions about psychotherapy and other psychological interventions are not rooted in neuroscience would be demonstrably fallacious. Even cognitive–behavioural therapy, one of the most studied psychotherapeutic interventions, was developed by a neurologist and recognises that the brain undergoes significant changes due to cognitions, ultimately leading to maladaptive behaviours beyond conscious awareness or personal agency.Reference Beck and Beck3 One cannot speak of psychiatric disorders without recognising and appreciating the organ responsible for behaviour and cognition.

The formulation of diagnoses and treatments for psychiatric conditions certainly differs from that of ‘neurological’ conditions such as mild traumatic brain injury, stroke and epilepsy. However, significant evidence suggests that psychiatric research is on the brink of discovering quantitative measures of its disorders, including but not limited to neuroimaging techniques,Reference Zhang, Chen, Jia and Gong4, Reference Sublette, Milak, Galfalvy, Oquendo, Malone and Mann5 neuropsychological evaluations,Reference Gujral, Dombrovski, Butters, Clark, Reynolds III and Szanto6Reference Richard-Devantoy, Berlim and Jollant8 and psychological tests such as those related to implicit associations.Reference Nock, Park, Finn, Deliberto, Dour and Banaji9, Reference Glenn, Werntz, Slama, Steinman, Teachman and Nock10 If one is to believe that psychiatry will remain entirely distinct from neurology and that the field need not merge with the professionals who also treat the central nervous system manifestations of brain dysfunction, regardless of aetiology, then psychiatry is destined to lose its footing when technology catches up to the incessantly changing brain that falls prey to inter- and intrapersonal events.

References

1Fitzgerald, M. Do psychiatry and neurology need a close partnership or merger? BJPsych Bull 2015; 39(3): 105–7.Google Scholar
2Datta, V. Psychiatry is more than neuropsychiatry. BJPsych Bull 2015; 39(5): 263. doi:10/1192/pb.39.5.263Google Scholar
3Beck, JS, Beck, AT. Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond (2nd edn). Guilford Press, 2011.Google Scholar
4Zhang, H, Chen, Z, Jia, Z, Gong, Q. Dysfunction of neural circuitry in depressive patients with suicidal behaviors: a review of structural and functional neuroimaging. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2014; 53: 61–6.Google Scholar
5Sublette, ME, Milak, MS, Galfalvy, HC, Oquendo, MA, Malone, KM, Mann, JJ. Regional brain glucose uptake distinguishes suicide attempters from non-attempters in major depression. Arch Suicide Res 2013; 17(4): 434–47.Google Scholar
6Gujral, S, Dombrovski, AY, Butters, M, Clark, L, Reynolds III, CF, Szanto, K. Impaired executive function in contemplated and attempted suicide in late life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014; 22(8): 811–9.Google Scholar
7Keilp, JG, Gorlyn, M, Russell, M, Oquendo, MA, Burke, AK, Harkavy-Friedman, J, et al. Neuropsychological function and suicidal behavior: attention control, memory and executive dysfunction in suicide attempt. Psychol Med 2013; 43(3): 539–51.Google Scholar
8Richard-Devantoy, S, Berlim, MT, Jollant, F. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological markers of vulnerability to suicidal behavior in mood disorders. Psychol Med 2014; 44(8): 1663–73.Google Scholar
9Nock, MK, Park, JM, Finn, CT, Deliberto, TL, Dour, HJ, Banaji, MR. Measuring the suicidal mind: implicit cognitions predict suicidal behavior. Psychol Sci 2010; 21(4): 511–7.Google Scholar
10Glenn, JJ, Werntz, AJ, Slama, SJK, Steinman, SA, Teachman, BA, Nock, MK. Suicide and self-injury-related implicit cognition: a large-scale examination and replication. J Abnorm Psychol 2017; 126(2): 199211.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.