Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:29:55.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitat use by the globally endangered Hinde's Babbler Turdoides hindei and its sympatric relative, the Northern Pied Babbler T. hypoleucus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Peter Njoroge
Affiliation:
National Museums of Kenya, Department of Ornithology, P. O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya
Leon A. Bennun
Affiliation:
National Museums of Kenya, Department of Ornithology, P. O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya
Luc Lens
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Laboratory for Animal Ecology, University of Antwerp (UIA), B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We examined and compared territoriality and habitat use of two congeneric babbler species in Kirinyaga district, central Kenya, with the aim of explaining their differences in global conservation status. Hinde's Babbler Turdoides hindei is a scarce, globally Endangered species whereas Northern Pied Babbler T. hypoleucus is much more abundant and widespread, and occurs throughout the range of Hinde's Babbler. Our findings suggested a lack of flexibility in the choice of habitat by Hinde's Babbler, whose territories were centred on a scarce habitat type: Lantana thickets in river valleys or near swamps. The two species showed similar daily foraging ranges but Hinde's Babbler occupied smaller group territories, whose size was not related to group size. Aggressive encounters between the two species occurred over shared feeding grounds, all of which were initiated and won by Hinde's Babbler. Its dependence on Lantana thickets makes Hinde's Babbler highly susceptible to further habitat loss within its range.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1998

References

Andrén, H. (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T. and Balmford, A. (1996) Atlantic forest extinctions. Nature 380: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 215244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collar, N. J. and Stuart, S. N. (1985) Threatened birds of Africa and related islands: The ICBP/ IUCN Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: ICBP/IUCN.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J. and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch 2. The world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
Dhondt, A. (1996) Molecular techniques in conservation and evolutionary biology: a quantum leap? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 147148.Google Scholar
Jaetzold, R. and Schmidt, D. (1983) Farm management handbook of Kenya: East Kenya, II/B. Nairobi: Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya/GTZ, Germany.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. T. and Turner, F. B. (1969) Measurement of a non-circular home range. J. Theor. Biol. 22: 227237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, R. C. (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection and population subdivision. Conserv. Biol. 1: 143158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lens, L. (1992) Variation in coherence of crested tit winter flocks: an example of multivariate optimization. Ada Oecol. 13: 553567.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. D. (1984) Hinde's Pied Babbler Turdoides hindei south of Machakos, Kenya. Scopus 8: 4849.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. and Pomeroy, D. E. (1989) A bird atlas of Kenya. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. and Parker, G. A. (1991) Competition for resources. Pp. 137168 inGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B., eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, R. C. (1966) Simultaneous statistical inferences. New York: McGraw-Hill. Mohr, C. O. (1947) Table of equivalent populations of Northern American small mammals.Google Scholar
Am. Midi. Nat. 37: 223249.Google Scholar
Neu, C. W., Byers, C. R. and Peek, J. M. (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. j. Wildl. Mgmt. 38: 541545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njoroge, P. and Bennun, L. A. (1996) Status and conservation of Hinde's Babbler Turdoides hindei, a threatened species in an agricultural landscape. Ostrich (Suppl). 67: 170172Google Scholar
Njoroge, P. and Mutinda, D. (in press) Notes on nesting of Hinde's Babbler Turdoides hindei and Northern Pied Babbler T. hypoleucus in Central Kenya. Ostrich.Google Scholar
Plumb, W. J. (1979) Observations on Hinde's Pied Babbler Turdoides hindei. Scopus 3: 6167.Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1987) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1977) Status and distribution of East African endemic species. Scopus 1: 111.Google Scholar
Turner, D. (1992) Threatened birds of Kenya 2: Hinde's Pied Babbler. Kenya Birds 1: 4647.Google Scholar