Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:55:34.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Components Involved in Avian-Caused Outages in Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2020

MAHMOOD KOLNEGARI*
Affiliation:
Iran’s Birds and Power Lines Committee, Arak, Iran.
GREG J. CONWAY
Affiliation:
British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK.
ALI AKBAR BASIRI
Affiliation:
Power Distribution Company of Markazi Province, Arak, Iran.
CONNOR T. PANTER
Affiliation:
Ecology, Conservation and Zoonosis Research and Enterprise Group, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
MANDANA HAZRATI
Affiliation:
Iran’s Birds and Power Lines Committee, Arak, Iran.
MARYAM SHAMS RAFIEE
Affiliation:
Tavanir Safety, Health and Environment Department, Tehran, Iran.
MIGUEL FERRER
Affiliation:
Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Seville, Spain.
JAMES F. DWYER
Affiliation:
EDM International, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: mahkolnegari@yahoo.com

Summary

Avian electrocutions are a global conservation problem. Power outages associated with electrocutions are problematic for electric utilities focused on delivering reliable electric power. We used contextual data, photographs, line voltage, outage type and assessments of power line components to quantify outage-causing avian electrocutions throughout each of Iran’s 31 provinces. We evaluated records of 222 avian-caused outages involving 235 electrocuted birds in 2018. Of these, 14.5% involved species of conservation concern, and a few (at least eight) sparked fires when the plumage of electrocuted birds ignited and fell into dry vegetation. Most avian-caused outages (96%) involved distribution voltages, and 91% involved phase-to-ground contacts attributable to grounded concrete pylons with grounded steel crossarms. These are the most common type of power line structure in Iran. Insulators were involved in 37% of outage-causing avian electrocutions, fused cutouts 29%, transformers 33%, and midspan collisions 1%. Given the numbers of these components in the electrical system, fused cutouts and transformers were involved in more outage-causing avian electrocutions than expected due to chance. The average body size of electrocuted birds was largest for incidents involving suspension insulators, smaller for birds electrocuted on other insulators, and smallest for electrocutions on fused cutouts and transformers. Given that most avian electrocutions do not cause outages and given the similarity across electric systems in the region, our findings likely indicate a much larger avian electrocution concern throughout the middle east. Retrofitting power line components to reduce avian contacts would reduce impacts to wildlife and improve the electrical system’s reliability, reduce costs associated with unplanned outages, and reduce risks associated power line ignitions of fires.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APLIC (Avian Power Line Interaction Committee) (2006) Suggested practices for avian protection on power lines: The state of the art in 2006. Washington, DC and Sacramento, CA: Edison Electric Institute, APLIC, and the California Energy Commission.Google Scholar
Bayle, P. (1999) Preventing birds of prey problems at transmission lines in Western Europe. J. Raptor Res. 33: 4348.Google Scholar
Bedrosian, G., Carlisle, J. D., Woodbridge, B., Dunk, J. R., Wallace, Z. P., Dwyer, J. F., Harness, R. E., Mojica, E. K., Williams, G. E. and Jones, T. (2020) A spatially explicit model to predict the relative risk of Golden Eagle electrocutions. J. Raptor Res. 54: 110125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevanger, K. (1994) Bird interactions with utility structures: collision and electrocution, causes and mitigating measures. Ibis 136: 412425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevanger, K. (1998) Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: a review. Biol. Conserv. 86: 6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boinski, S., Jack, K., Lamarsh, C. and Coltrane, J. A. (1998) Squirrel monkeys in Costa Rica: drifting to extinction. Oryx 32: 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerdzhiev, D. A. (2014) Factors influencing bird mortality caused by power lines within special protected areas and undertaken conservation efforts. Acta Zool. Bulg. 66: 411423.Google Scholar
Demerdzhiev, D. A., Stoychev, S. A., Petrov, T. H., Angelov, I. D. and Nedyalkov, N. P. (2009) Impact of power lines on bird mortality in Southern Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 61: 175183.Google Scholar
Demeter, I., Horváth, M., Nagy, K., Görögh, Z., Tóth, P., Bagyura, J., Solt, S., Kovács, A., Dwyer, J. F. and Harness, R. E. (2018) Documenting and reducing avian electrocutions in Hungary: A conservation contribution from citizen scientists. Wilson J. Ornithol. 130: 600614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A., Batbayar, N., Bold, B., Davaasuren, B., Erdenechimeg, T., Galtbalt, B., Tsolmonjav, P., Ichinkhorloo, S., Gunga, A., Purevochir, G. and Lutfor Rahman, M. (2020) Variation in electrocution rate and demographic composition of Saker Falcons electrocuted at power lines in Mongolia. J. Raptor Res. 54: 136146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dou-niu, L. and Li-qun, S. (2015) The identification between transient faults and permanent faults on transmission lines based on power spectrum. Int. J. Comput. Consum. Control 4: 18.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. F. (2004) Investigating and mitigating raptor electrocution in an urban environment. MSc thesis. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. F. and Mannan, R. W. (2007) Preventing raptor electrocutions in an urban environment. J. Raptor Res. 41: 259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, J. F., Garrido Lopez, J. R., Martín, J. M. and Horváth, M. (2017a) Proper retrofitting protects wildlife. T&D World 69: 2630.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. F., Gerber, B. D., Petersen, P., Armstrong, W. E. and Harness, R. E. (2020) Power pole density and avian electrocution risk in the western United States. J. Raptor Res. 54: 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, J. F., Harness, R. E. and Donohue, K. (2014) Predictive model of avian electrocution risk on overhead power lines. Conserv. Biol. 28: 159168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, J. F., Harness, R. E. and Eccleston, D. (2017b) Avian electrocutions on incorrectly retrofitted power poles. J. Raptor Res. 51: 293304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, J. F., Harness, R. E., Gallentine, T. and Stewart, A. H. (2019) Documenting and preventing wildlife-caused fires in power line rights of way. Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management. 12th International Symposium. Utility Arborist Association. 12: 2331.Google Scholar
Ferrer, M. (2012) Birds and Power Lines from Conflict to Solution. Seville. Spain: Endesa S. A. and Fundación Migres.Google Scholar
Ferrer, M. and Hiraldo, F. (1992) Man-induced sex-biased mortality in the Spanish Imperial Eagle. Biol. Conserv. 60: 5760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, M., De la Riva, M. and Castroviejo, J. (1991) Electrocution of raptors on power lines in southwestern Spain. J. Field Ornithol. 62: 181190.Google Scholar
Fritts, T. H. (2002) Economic costs of electrical system instability and power outages caused by snakes on the Island of Guam. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 49: 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guil, F., Soria, M. A., Margalida, A. and Perez-Garcia, J. M. (2018) Wildfires as collateral effects of wildlife electrocution: An economic approach to the situation in Spain in recent years. Sci. Total Environ. 625: 460469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harness, R. E. and Wilson, K. R. (2001) Electric-utility structures associated with raptor electrocutions in rural areas. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29: 612623.Google Scholar
Harness, R. E., Juvvadi, P. R. and Dwyer, J. F. (2013) Avian electrocutions in western Rajasthan, India. J. Raptor Res. 47: 352364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. M. and Pimm, S. L. (2004) Bird species' tolerance of secondary forest habitats and its effects on extinction. Conserv. Biol. 18: 16071616.Google Scholar
Harris, J. B. C., Green, J. M. H., Prawiradilaga, D. M., Giam, X., Giyanto, D. H., Putra, C. A. and Wilcove, D. S. (2015) Using market data and expert opinion to identify overexploited species in the wild bird trade. Biol. Conserv. 187: 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Lambraño, R. E., Sánchez-Agudo, J. Á. and Carbonell, R. (2018) Where to start? Development of a spatial tool to prioritise retrofitting of power line poles that are dangerous to raptors. J. Appl. Ecol. 55: 26852697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. C. A. and Ledger, J. A. 1986. Some environmental impacts of electricity transmission and distribution lines. Association of Municipal Electricity Undertakings of South Africa. Proceedings 11th Tech. Meeting: 4146.Google Scholar
IUCN (2020) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org Google Scholar
Janss, G. F. and Ferrer, M. (2001) Avian electrocution mortality in relation to pole design and adjacent habitat in Spain. Bird Conserv. Int. 11: 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, A. R., Smallie, J. J. and Diamond, M. (2010) Avian collisions with power lines: a global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 20: 263278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsis, L., Cunneyworth, P. M. K. K., Turner, M. E. and Presotto, A. (2018) Spatial patterns of primate electrocutions in Diani, Kenya. Int. J. Primatol. 39: 493510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, C. M., Court, G. S. and Beck, J. A. (2013) Estimating raptor electrocution mortality on distribution power lines in Alberta, Canada. J. Wildl. Manage. 77: 13421352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolnegari, M. and Harness, R. E. (2020) Three-phase transformer arcing horns; neglected deadly components to birds. Avocetta, 44: 3742.Google Scholar
Kolnegari, M., Basiri, A. A., Hazrati, M. and Dwyer, J. F. (2020) Effects of nest box installation on a distribution power line: Increased Common Kestrel nesting, reduced electrocutions, and reduced electrical faults. J. Raptor Res. 54(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolnegari, M., Moghimi, E., Basiri, A. A., Turk Qashqaei, A. and Hazrati, M. (2019) A new committee to address the threats of power grids to birds in Iran. Biodiversity 20: 161164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolnegari, M., Turk Ghashqaei, A., Hazrati, M., Basiri, A. A., Mojaver Tork Abad, M. and Ferrer, M. (2018) Rare cases of carnivore mortality due to electric power distribution lines in Iran. Zool. Ecol. 28: 418420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, R. N., Kennedy, P. L. and Savidge, J. A. (2007) The state of the art in raptor electrocution research: A global review. Biol. Conserv. 136: 159174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, J., Xing, W., Zeng, G., Li, X., Peng, Y., Li, X., Gao, X. and He, X. (2018) Where will threatened migratory birds go under climate change? Implications for China’s national nature reserves. Sci. Total Env. 645: 10401047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-López, P., Ferrer, M., Madero, A., Casado, E. and Mcgrady, M. (2011) Solving man-induced large-scale conservation problems: The Spanish Imperial Eagle and power lines. PLoS ONE 6: e17196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loss, S. R., Will, T. and Marra, P. P. (2014) Refining estimates of bird collision and electrocution mortality at power lines in the United States. PLoS ONE 9: e101565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, K. K., Rozhon, G. C. and Dwyer, J. F. (2019) Conservation letter: raptor persecution. J. Raptor Res. 53: 230233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mañosa, S. (2001) Strategies to identify dangerous electricity pylons for birds. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 19972012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maricato, L., Faria, R., Madeira, V., Carreira, P. and de Almeida, A. T. (2016) White stork risk mitigation in high voltage electric distribution networks. Ecol. Eng. 91: 212220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Energy (2018) [Extensive information of Iran's power industry]. Tehran, Iran: Tavanir Company. (In Persian).Google Scholar
Panter, C. T., Atkinson, E. D. and White, R. L. (2019) Quantifying the global legal trade in live CITES-listed raptors and owls for commercial purposes over a 40-year period. Avocetta 43: 2336.Google Scholar
Peretto, L. (2010) The role of measurements in the smart grid era. IEEE Instru. Meas. Mag. 13: 2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahai, S. and Pahwa, A. (2006) A probabilistic approach for animal-caused outages in overhead distribution systems. 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, PMAPS: 17.Google Scholar
Sergio, F., Marchesi, L., Pedrini, P., Ferrer, M. and Penteriani, V. (2004) Electrocution alters the distribution and density of a top predator, the eagle owl Bubo bubo. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 836845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, L. (2011) Collins Bird Guide. 2nd Edition. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Tintó, A., Real, J. and Mañosa, S. (2010) Predicting and correcting electrocution of birds in Mediterranean areas. J. Wildlife Manage. 74: 18521862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, S. (2016) Risk communication in Chile: A study of 2014 Valparaiso Wildfire. MSc thesis. British Columbia, Canada. http://summit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/16691/etd9621_SVargas.pdf Google Scholar
Voronova, V. (2012) Assessing of impact of power lines on birds in Central Kazakhstan steppes. http://www.conservationleadershipprogramme.org/project/impact-of-power-lines-on-birds-kazakhstan/ Google Scholar
Wang, L. (2016) The fault causes of overhead lines in distribution network. MATEC Web of Conferences 61. http://dx.10.1051/matecconf/2016610.org/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woinarski, J. C. Z., Woolley, L. A., Garnett, S. T., Legge, S. M., Murphy, B. P., Lawes, M. J., Comer, S., Dickman, C. R., Doherty, T. S., Edwards, G., Nankivill, A., Palmer, R. and Paton, D. (2017) Compilation and traits of Australian bird species killed by cats. Biol. Conserv. 216: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar