Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:38:02.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What is fuzziness, and how much does it explain?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2021

Kristin Lemhöfer*
Affiliation:
Radboud University Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Address for correspondence: Kristin Lemhöfer, E-mail: kristin.lemhofer@donders.ru.nl

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Peer Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cook, SV, Pandža, NB, Lancaster, AK and Gor, K (2016) Fuzzy nonnative phonolexical representations lead to fuzzy form-to-meaning mappings. Frontiers in Psychology 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diependaele, K, Lemhöfer, K and Brysbaert, M (2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66, 843863. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.720994CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T and van Heuven, WJB (1998) The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J and Jacobs, AM (eds), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 189225.Google Scholar
Gollan, TH, Montoya, RI, Cera, C and Sandoval, TC (2008) More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 787814. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, CJ (2002) The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 40, 6987. doi:10.1515/iral.2002.008Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K and Broersma, M (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods 44, 325343. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemhöfer, K, Dijkstra, T, Schriefers, H, Baayen, RH, Grainger, J and Zwitserlood, P (2008) Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A mega-study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34, 1231. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.12Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K, Schriefers, H and Hanique, I (2010) Native language effects in learning second-language grammatical gender: A training study. Acta Psychologica 135, 150158. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemhöfer, K, Schriefers, H and Indefrey, P (2014) Idiosyncratic grammars: Syntactic processing in second language comprehension uses subjective feature representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26, 14281444. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemhöfer, K, Spalek, K and Schriefers, H (2008) Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 312330. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecher, D, de Rooij, J and Zeelenberg, R (2009) Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors. Memory & Cognition 37, 541546. doi:10.3758/mc.37.5.541CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C (2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 11, 357383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santesteban, M and Schwieter, JW (2020) Lexical selection and competition in bilinguals. In Cieślicka, AB and Heredia, RR (eds), Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar