Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:41:42.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Straw man: Who thought exposure was the ONLY factor?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2016

VIRGINIA C. MUELLER GATHERCOLE
VIRGINIA C. MUELLER GATHERCOLE*
Affiliation:
Florida International University
*
Address for correspondence: V. C. Mueller Gathercole, Linguistics Program, English Department, Florida International University, Miami, FL33199, vmueller@fiu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Carroll (Carroll) purports to contrast one view of language development in bilinguals, based on exposure, with another, based on processing. She claims that some researchers view language acquisition in bilinguals as founded solely on exposure and argues that language acquisition involves more than this, including analogy, associative learning, instance-based learning, rule-learning, and statistical learning.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 23 - 24
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Erika Hoff and Barbara Pearson for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this response.

References

Armon-Lote-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (eds.) (2015). Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from Specific Language Impairment. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E. Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000863.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2002). Monolingual and bilingual acquisition: Learning different treatments of that-trace phenomena in English and Spanish. In Oller, D.K. & Eilers, R. (Eds.), Language & literacy in bilingual children (pp. 220–254). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: Constructivist account of morpho-syntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 10, 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M (2014). Bilingualism matters: One size does not fit all. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 359–366.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (in press). Perspective on proficiency in bilinguals. In Nicoladis, E & Montanari, S (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Hoff, E. (2007). Input and the acquisition of language: Three questions. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), The handbook of language development (pp. 107–127). NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2013). Commentary on Issues in the assessment of bilinguals and Solutions for the assessment of bilinguals . In Gathercole, V. C. M. (Ed.), Solutions for the assessment of bilinguals (pp. (213–226). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnert, K. (2010). Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 456–473.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., de la Fuente, I., Davidson, J., & Foote, R. (2013). Gender in Spanish: Evidence from L2 learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research, 29, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Foote, R. (2014). Age of acquisition (AoA) interactions in bilingual lexical access: A study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 274–303.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. (Eds.). (2002). Language & literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, D. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. (2013). Distinguishing the bilingual as a late talker from the late talker who is bilingual. In Rescorla, L. A. & Dale, P. S. (Eds.), Late talkers: Language development, interventions, and outcomes (pp. 67–87). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Peña, E., & Bedore, L. (2011). It takes two: Improving assessment accuracy in bilingual children. The ASHA Leader. https://www.academia.edu/2594526/It_Takes_Two_Improving_Assessment_Accuracy_in_Bilingual_Children Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10, 131–156.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (in press). Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In Nicoladis, E. & Montanari, S. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar