Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T09:10:21.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do gestures follow speech in bilinguals’ description of motion?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2015

ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. Şeyda Özçalışkan, Georgia State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302—5010, United States. seyda@gsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When do the gestures do and do not follow the patterns of the language one speaks? We examined this question by studying 10 Turkish-English bilingual adults (Turkish as L1) in comparison to 10 monolingual English and 10 monolingual Turkish adults as they described motion events either in speech with gesture (co-speech gesture) or only in gesture without speech (silent gesture). All speakers – monolingual and bilingual – showed cross-linguistic differences in co-speech gesture but not in silent gesture. Moreover, bilinguals followed L1 co-speech gesture patterns even when speaking L2, suggesting that acquisition of native-like gesture patterns does not co-occur with the acquisition of native-like speech patterns in bilinguals.

Keywords

bilingual gesturesecond languageco-speech gesturesilent gesturecrosslinguistic gesturemotion eventsEnglishTurkish
Type
Research Notes
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 644 - 653
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Thanks to Anthony Casagrande, Vanessa Larick, and Christianne Ramdeen for their help in stimuli development, data collection and coding and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments; supported by a GSU Language and Literacy Grant to the author.

References

Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. (2008). Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture. SSLA, 30, 225–251.Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Lantolf, J. P. (2008). Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication. Motion events in the speech and gesture of L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse. A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Hadar, U., Dar, R., & Teitelman, A. (2001). Gesture during speech in first and second language: Implications for lexical retrieval. Gesture, 1, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does crosslinguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd Ed). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E. (2007). The effect of bilingualism on the use of manual gestures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 441–454.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E., Pika, S., Yin, H., & Marentette, P. (2007). Gesture use in story recall by Chinese-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2005). Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (1), 207–246.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2009). Learning to talk about spatial motion in language-specific ways. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Ervin-Tripp, S., Budwig, N., Nakamura, K. & Özçalışkan, Ş (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 263–276). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Guo, E., Lieven, S., Ervin-Tripp, N., Budwig, K., Nakamura, & Özçalışkan, Ş. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Do iconic gestures pave the way for children's early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1143–1162.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition. In press.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning ‘how to search for the frog’: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish and Turkish. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H. & Tano, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 541–552). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A. (2002). Speech-language relationship across languages and in second language learners: Implications for spatial thinking and speaking. Skarabella, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 500–509). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44 (4), 1040–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, J., & Nicoladis, E. (2004). Gestures by advanced Spanish–English second-language learners. Gesture, 4, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought’ and ‘language’ to ‘thinking for speaking. In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd Ed). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stam, G. (2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. IRAL, 44, 145–171.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar