Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:36:31.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why do Conditioned Responses Show Incrementation, while Unconditioned Responses Show Habituation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

H. J. Eysenck
H. J. Eysenck
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a series of short invited contributions from therapists and research workers who have volunteered to answer the following question: “If your fairy godmother were to wave her magic wand and give you an immediate answer to a question or questions, without having to do the relevant research, what would you most like to know?”

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 217 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press, p. 167et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). Single-trial conditioning and the Napalkov phenomenon. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 63–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1968). A theory of the incubation of anxiety/fear response. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. (1970a). A mish-mash of theories. International Journal of Psychiatry 9, 140–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1970b). Behavior therapy and its critics. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1976a). Behaviour therapy—dogma or applied science? In Theoretical and Experimental Bases of the Behaviour Therapies. Feldman, M. P. and Broadhurst, A. (Eds), London: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1976b). The learning theory model of neurosis—a new approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy 14, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The conditioning model of neurosis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 155–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1980). A unified theory of psychotherapy, behaviour therapy and spontaneous remission. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 188, 43–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Rachman, S. and Hodgson, R. (1981). Obsessions and Compulsions. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.