Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T11:15:22.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning After Brain Injury by the Method of Vanishing Cues: A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Nicholas R. C. Leng ,
Alexandre G. Copello  and
Antoine Sayegh
Nicholas R. C. Leng
Affiliation:
Royal Hospital and Home, London
Alexandre G. Copello
Affiliation:
Royal Hospital and Home, London
Antoine Sayegh
Affiliation:
Royal Hospital and Home, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Memory disorders feature amongst the most common complaints following brain injury. Theories of recovery and data derived from cognitive rehabilitation studies indicate that restoration of function is not a realistic goal, but recent work suggests that memory disordered patients often retain residual learning capabilities that can be utilized in teaching them certain kinds of information of practical use. This paper describes encouraging results obtained in teaching a patient computer related information by the method of vanishing cues. The patient learned more rapidly with this method than with anticipation learning, he showed evidence of good retention and, in contrast to earlier studies, he showed some evidence of generalization. However, the method may not be effective for all patients.

Type
Clinical Section
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 173 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, D. N. and Baddeley, A. D. (1976). What can amnesic patients learn? Neuropsychologia 14, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, R. and Rozin, P. (1984). Activation of existing memories in anterograde amnesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 93, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glisky, E. L. Schacter, D. L. and Tulving, E. (1986). Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 3, 292–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glisky, E. L. and Schacter, D. L. (1988). Long-term retention of computer learning by patients with memory disorders. Neuropsychologia 26, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P. and Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 11, 386–396.Google ScholarPubMed
Graf, P., Squire, L. R. and Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesics do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 10, 164–178.Google Scholar
Leng, N. R. C. and Copello, A. G. (1990). Rehabilitation of memory after brain injury: is there an effective technique? Clinical Rehabilitation 4, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, N. R. C. and Parkin, A. J. (1988). Amnesic patients can benefit from instructions to use imagery: evidence against the cognitive mediation hypothesis. Cortex 24, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, A. J. (1982). Residual learning capability in organic amnesia. Cortex 18, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, A. J. (1987). Memory and Amnesia: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parkin, A. J. and Leng, N. R. C. (1988). Comparative studies of human amnesia: syndrome or syndromes? In Markowitsch, H. (Ed). Information Processing by the Brain: Views and Hypotheses from a Physiological-Cognitive Perspective. Toronto: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
Parkin, A. J. and Leng, N. R. C. (1991). The Neuropsychology of Amnesic Syndromes. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.Google Scholar
Robinson, F. P. (1970). Effective Study. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist 40, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. A. (1987). Rehabilitation of Memory. London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.