Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T00:31:54.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Worry and Defensive Pessimism: A Test of Two Intervention Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Ted Thompson*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania. T.Thompson@utas.edu.au
Brontë Mason
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania.
Iain Montgomery
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania.
*
*Address for correspondence: Ted Thompson, PhD, School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-30, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of counterfactual reasoning and relaxation training in reducing worry and defensive pessimism. Thirty-three participants classified as both worriers and defensive pessimists were allocated to either counterfactual reasoning, relaxation training, or control groups. Participants in counterfactual reasoning and relaxation training groups attended four weekly training sessions. Significant reductions in worry between pre- and post-test were evident for scores on the Worry Domains Questionnaire, as well as a reduced tendency to engage in the kind of prototypical thinking characteristic of defensive pessimists as assessed by the Defensive Pessimism / Strategic Optimism Strategy Prototypes Questionnaire. Reductions were also evident in the percentage of the day spent worrying, the intrusiveness of worries, and ratings of the likelihood of worry events occurring.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)