Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:04:48.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Commentary on Psychosocial Interventions and Evidence-Based Practice: Time for Reflection About What an ‘Ideal’ Psychosocial Intervention Would Look Like in Clinical Psychology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Neville J. King*
Affiliation:
Monash University, Australia. Neville.King@Education.monash.edu.au
Thomas H. Ollendick
Affiliation:
Child Study Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States of America.
*
*Address for correspondence: Neville King, Faculty of Education, Monash University, PO Box 6, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Controlled efficacy/effectiveness trials throughout the world have reached a high standard from a methodological stance, but what do we regard as the ideal or elegant intervention in clinical psychology? This article presents six key points as the gold standards of psychosocial interventions by which treatment efficacy/effectiveness research with children, adolescents and adults might be evaluated: (1) theoretical rationale and conceptualisation of clinical dysfunction, (2) clear problem identification and target client group, (3) program features such as realistic goal setting, flexibility, and time-limited interventions, (4) manual-based treatments, (5) research support including clinically significant outcomes, and (6) acceptability/social validation of clients and society. Finally, we discuss the usefulness of such a framework for mental health professionals and clinical researchers.

Type
Invited Essay
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)