Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T09:48:52.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When local causes are more explanatorily useful

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Pierrick Bourrat*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia Department of Philosophy & Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia p.bourrat@gmail.com, pierrickbourrat.com

Abstract

Madole & Harden plead for better integration of causal knowledge of different depths to understand complex human traits. Classically, local causes – a particular type of shallow causes – are considered less useful than more generalisable causes, giving a false impression that the latter causes are more useful and desirable. Using a simple example, I show that sometimes the contrary is true.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourrat, P. (2020). Causation and single nucleotide polymorphism heritability. Philosophy of Science, 87, 10731083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourrat, P. (2021). Heritability, causal influence and locality. Synthese, 198, 66896715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54, 421431.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 400.Google ScholarPubMed
Sesardic, N. (2005). Making sense of heritability. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2010). Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology & Philosophy, 25, 287318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar