Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:20:27.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proxies, heuristics, and goal alignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Bruce D. Burns Open the ORCID record for Bruce D. Burns [Opens in a new window]
Bruce D. Burns*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia http://sydney.edu.au/science/people/bruce.burns.php
*
Corresponding author: Bruce D. Burns; Email: bruce.burns@sydney.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Decision-making heuristics rely on proxies so the elements of heuristics appear to map well to the elements of proxies identified by John et al. However, unlike proxy failure, heuristics do not fail because of feedback. This may be because for successful heuristics the goals of regulators and agents are aligned, but this is not the case for proxy failure.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e71
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed