Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:32:46.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Priming recognition memory test cues: No evidence for an attributional basis of recollection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2020

Carmen F. Ionita
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, United Kingdom. carmenflorentina.ionita@postgrad.manchester.ac.ukdt492@cam.ac.ukjason.taylor@manchester.ac.ukhttps://www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/staff/dr-deborah-talmihttps://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/jason.taylor.html
Deborah Talmi
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, United Kingdom. carmenflorentina.ionita@postgrad.manchester.ac.ukdt492@cam.ac.ukjason.taylor@manchester.ac.ukhttps://www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/staff/dr-deborah-talmihttps://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/jason.taylor.html
Jason R. Taylor
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, United Kingdom. carmenflorentina.ionita@postgrad.manchester.ac.ukdt492@cam.ac.ukjason.taylor@manchester.ac.ukhttps://www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/staff/dr-deborah-talmihttps://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/jason.taylor.html

Abstract

We argue that while the proposed memory model by Bastin et al. can explain familiarity-based memory judgements through the interaction of a core representation system and an attribution system, recollection-based memory judgements are not based on non-mnemonic signals being attributed to memory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hamann, S. B. & Squire, L. R. (1997) Intact Perceptual Memory in the Absence of Conscious Memory. Behavioral Neuroscicnce III(4):850–54. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. & Whitehouse, K. (1989) An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 118(2):126–35. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., Taylor, J. R., Wang, W., Gao, C. & Guo, C. (2017) Electrophysiological signals associated with fluency of different levels of processing reveal multiple contributions to recognition memory. Consciousness and Cognition 53:113. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.05.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008) The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(6):237–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajaram, S. (1993) Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition 21(1):89102. DOI: 10.3758/BF03211168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4):364–82. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R., Buratto, L. G. & Henson, R. N. (2013) Behavioral and neural evidence for masked conceptual priming of recollection. Cortex 49(6):1511–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. R. & Henson, R. N. (2012a) Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 50(13):3027–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woollams, A. M., Taylor, J. R., Karayanidis, F. & Henson, R. N. (2008) Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(6):1114–29. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed