Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:14:47.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expanding the range of vulnerabilities to pathological gambling: A consideration of over-fast discounting processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Carl W. Lejuez  and
Marc N. Potenza
Carl W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Center for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Marc N. Potenza
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT 06519. clejuez@psyc.umd.eduwww.addiction.umd.edumarc.potenza@yale.eduwww.med.yale.edu/psych/faculty/potenza.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Redish et al. present a compelling, interdisciplinary, unified framework of addiction. The effort to integrate pathological gambling is especially important, but only the vulnerability of misclassifying situations is described in detail as being linked directly to this disorder. This commentary focuses on further developing the comprehensiveness of this framework for pathological gambling using over-fast discounting as an illustrative example.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 452 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, G. (1975) Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin 82:463–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alessi, S. M. & Petry, N. M. (2003) Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes 64(3):345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR™), 4th edition.American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bornovalova, M. A., Lejuez, C. W., Daughters, S. B., Rosenthal, M. Z. & Lynch, T. R. (2005) Impulsivity as a common process across borderline personality and substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 25:790–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, A. (2007) Delay discounting and problem gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior 1:21–22.Google Scholar
Dixon, M. R., Jacobs, E. A. & Sanders, S. (2006) Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 39:413–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, M. R., Marley, J. & Jacobs, E. A. (2003) Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36:449–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollander, E. & Wong, C. M. (1995) Obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 56:3–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, D. D., Green, L. & Myerson, J. (2003) Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behavioural Processes 64:355–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M. & Bickel, W. K. (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128(1):78–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koob, G. F. & Le Moal, M. (2001) Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24(2):97–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan-Sarin, S., Reynolds, B., Duhig, A. M., Smith, A., Liss, T., McFertridge, A., Cavallo, D. A., Carroll, K. M. & Potenza, M. N. (2007) Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 88:79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, F., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M. & Swann, A. C. (2001) Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry 158:1783–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petry, N. M. (2001) Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110(3):482–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petry, N. M. (2005) Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity and treatment. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petry, N. M., Alessi, S. M., Carroll, K. M., Hanson, T., MacKinnon, S., Rounsaville, B. & Sierra, S. (2006) Contingency management treatments: Reinforcing abstinence versus adherence with goal-related activities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74:555–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petry, N. M. & Casarella, T. (1999) Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 56:25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachlin, H. & Green, L. (1972) Commitment, choice, and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 17:15–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, B. R. (2006) A review of delay-discounting research with humans: Relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural Pharmacology 17(8):651–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B. R., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B. & de Wit, H. (2006) Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences 40(2):305–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. B., Sabol, K. E. & de Wit, H. (1999) Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:432–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, L. (2002) A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 22(1):1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed